29
Yes, Kids, Cookie Monster is a Psyop (squamuglia.wordpress.com)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by mechwarrior2@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Sesame Street was created by veteran officers of the US Army’s Psychological Warfare Office with the goal of blunting the force of social-justice radicalism in the United States by promoting the liberal ideology that oppression not a structural economic injustice, but a matter of poor individual character or bad social skills. In a 1970’s state-directed project to determine how humans establish cathexis with military hardware, computer engineer Alan Kay leveraged the graphical capabilities of highly-advanced prototype personal computers to display animations of one of Sesame Street’s most popular characters, Cookie Monster, because he felt this would help children see personal computers not as technological artifacts derived from Air Force weapons, but as friendly and even “magical” helpers in their lives.

Kay, who developed the PARC Alto computer and Smalltalk programming language concurrently with Xerox funding the creation of Sesame Street, 
is very clear about this in his “Early History of Smalltalk.” Building the Sesame Street characters in to the design of the Alto’s user 
interface was an evolutionary step in ARPA’s 20 year study on “Human-Computer Symbiosis.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who thought classes in OOP were conceptually very similar to Plato's forms. Also, apparently OOP is bourgeois, as if I didn't have enough reasons to hate it.

[-] enkifish@hexbear.net 11 points 5 months ago

Long live the lambda-calculus of the proletariat

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Does this mean procedural programming is feudal?

[-] casskaydee@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

GOTO considered reactionary

[-] DPRK_Chopra@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago

Functional programming is the anarchism of software engineering. Sounds good on it's face, but very little in the way of real world successes to point to.

[-] WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

The majority of current tech infrastructure is set up for OOP, functional programming and tons of other styles would probably take off if it weren’t for that massive momentum

[-] DPRK_Chopra@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Money printer go [object Object]

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

Could it not be called fordist as well? thonk-cri

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13297 readers
972 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS