89
Women wrestlers rule
(stream.new)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)
196
16306 readers
1867 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
How do you distinguish between when people say "talent" to mean skills and when they legitimately mean talent?
If someone has just started learning to do something and is unexpectedly good at it, you can call that talent.
If you say that someone has a talent for doing something that they've done for a long time and put a lot of practice into, that's when I consider it rude.
What if someone does something for a long time and puts in a lot of practice and they're not as good as/better than other people with similar time & work?
Then the average person is going to have a much harder time attributing proficiency to either of those factors, and it's much more appropriate to just compliment their hard work and dedication.
Why is it more appropriate?
Because it acknowledges something someone worked for rather than something they were born with.
Do you think work is separable from a person's circumstances of birth? Lots of things influence a person's ability to work, chiefly how much money they were born into, but also some people are born with certain abilities that make them more capable of doing work.
Do you think work is more valuable because it somehow comes from a person's character? Is character separable from birth?
And also, what about someone who worked as hard as they could and could only ever achieve a middling career in their chosen field? Do you put their apparent failure down to simply not working hard enough? Do you think that's rude?