115
submitted 11 months ago by Copernican@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

TL;DR NY Times predicts trump will remain on the ballet and the ruling will likely have a very narrow basis in hopes of achieving unanimous consensus from the court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

And what if Colorado/Maine tells the SC to go piss up a rope after the ruling?

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 months ago

I'm no expert, but I would guess a constitutional crisis and then bad stuff (i.e. nobody knows, it's not supposed to happen).

Conceivably there could be military intervention; the national guard was called to intervene after many schools refused to comply with the ruling of Brown v. Board of Education.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Well, all the teabaggers that cry about "states rights" will surely support Colorado/Maine, right?

Right?

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

what if Colorado/Maine tells the SC to go piss up a rope after the ruling?

Who would care? The MAGA court has lost legitimacy.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The Court issues orders requiring compliance with the holding. If the state officials remain in defiance, then US Marshals arrest the noncompliant state officials, if necessary the President will order the federalizing of the National Guard to provide security to sites and personnel and to ensure compliance with federal law, and so on. Basically the full authority of the federal government being used to bring a rebellious state government to heel.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

That's not how this works. The blots would be printed without trumps name on them. Wtf is the national guard going to do, seize ballots? They have no authority. This is a states right issue. The scotus has no power here.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It is not a states’ rights issue, at least not exclusively or primarily. Where’d you get your law degree, Quiznos?

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Why would you expect that? SC overrides lower courts all the time and it doesn’t turn into insurrection.

this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
115 points (92.0% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2374 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS