149
Do any of these debate perverts even use the logic nerd terms correctly?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
149 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15840 readers
353 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
They just wanted to become dictators in the most difficult way possible, making the most powerful enemies in the world.
It happens all the time in fiction though and we know libs guzzle that as theory. Books are choke full of the evil demagogue types that need to be stopped by the brave status quo fighters, or they do something horrible like take the power.
For real. If I wanted power I’m just going to be a fascist politician or business owner who’s friendly to the colonial powers. Why the hell would I bet my entire ambitions on a revolution that has the deck stack against it?