422
submitted 1 year ago by Toes@ani.social to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Implicit multiplication takes priority over explicit multiplication or division. 2(2+2) is not the same thing as 2*(2+2).

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Correct! 2(2+2) is a single term - subject to The Distributive Law - and 2x(2+2) is 2 terms. Those who added a multiply sign there have effectively flipped the (2+2) from being in the denominator to being in the numerator, hence the wrong answer.

But it's not called "implicit multiplication" - it's Terms and/or The Distributive Law which applies (and they're 2 separate rules, so you cannot lump them together as a single rule).

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
422 points (100.0% liked)

196

16713 readers
2283 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS