this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
94 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13967 readers
779 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
94
Calling for a ceasefire in Israel/Palestine is a liberal position. The radical position is to call for supporting the Palestinian resistance until there is an end to Israeli apartheid. (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by HexbearGPT@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Fuck a ceasefire, END APARTHEID!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it's important to say that what matters is not what "the message" is that was intended and some sort of distractions/people disagreeing. That all must be subordinated to the actions/line of the party familiar with the conditions. It would be correct to 'rub the wrong way' if that were the line of PFLP. We dont subordinate to what is popular unless that is what is advantageous. Palestinians wanted a ceasefire and asked for westerners to support it, and that's why it's the correct line

[โ€“] MattsAlt@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks, that is well articulated