176
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Tbf, he should abdicate to a younger Democrat. I don't want to "settle for Joe".

I was pissed when Bernie Sanders had the rug pulled out from under him.

I really want to consolidate, but not under Joe Biden.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

I want change. I want new ideas. Progress and solutions. Biden has been in government for over fifty years- most of that in the senate for over 40 years.

He’s been a senator longer than I’ve been alive

It’s not a question of age. It’s a question of stagnation.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I'll take stagnation over fascism. What is the short term plan? I mean, what happens if the orange blob snakes his way back in because the purity ponies and the "independents" stomped their feet and had a hissy?

If that guy and his cohort get back in, it is most likely over for real elections in America.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I’ll take stagnation over fascism.

It's clear that the party prefers stagnation to progress as well.

[-] Kleinbonum@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

progress > stagnation >>>>>>> fascism

I don't understand people who go "if I can't have progress and I'm forced to vote for stagnation in order to prevent fascism, then I'm fine with fascism."

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It does not follow that everyone who isn't overjoyed with stagnation wants fascism.

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

It is if you're willing to let the fascists win because of it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Well, I'm voting for Biden. It's a shame that the party would rather stagnate and lose than progress and win.

[-] Gamoc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because the people offering stagnation are benefiting from the fascism. They're two sides of one coin and every time you flip the coin the sharp edges slice the throat of a poor person.

Besides, it's not stagnation, that implies not moving. We are actually moving backwards and the reason why republicans are able to ban abortion, engage in blatant corruption, and run for president whilst on trial is because the "stagnation" side refuses to mount a proper offence because, again, they're all benefitting from the situation.

[-] GooseFinger@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'd almost rather see our government burn down and get replaced by another than let status quo limp along another four years.

Real issues that real Americans want fixed have been ignored by Dems and Repubs alike for longer than I've been alive. Real issues, like widespread poverty wages, declining quality in public education, inaccess to healthcare, the prison system, terrible public transport in cities, no social safety nets, little action against climate change, etc. These issues have only gotten worse over time, so why would I vote for the status quo knowing that?

Hell, the "good" party in charge right now is actively supporting genocide in the east and keeping healthcare so expensive at homr that I can't get a cavity filled without taking lien out on my car. I'll never own a home despite being an engineer and having virtually zero debt. Life as an American fucking sucks, and if the last 80 years of American politics are anything to go by, then voting in the status quo in 2024 will continue making life worse.

The only American government that's been in charge while I've been alive has done nothing but make my life worse. If things continue this way, maybe Americans will finally reach their tipping point 100 years from now and grow the balls to take their government back. I'd rather not wait that long.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Stagnation is just the slow road to fascism.

[-] thesprongler@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I bet making fun of them is a great way to gain their favor.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Is there some kind of outreach for people that want white supremacy and xtian nationalism that would work for Hillary?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LordR@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago

Then vote for someone else in the primaries. But as soon as it is the general election it is either the democrat or fascism. Even if you don't vote at all, it will just strengthen the fascist party.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

There's no Democratic primary this year.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I mean, Dean Phillips and Marianne Williamson would probably disagree.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

You’re right about what we have to do, but are we even having primaries this time? Because of how the primary process was scheduled in 2020 Biden had the nomination all but locked up by the time I got to vote in them. I’m 100% voting for Biden, you can look into my comments and find me admonishing some asshole advocating for third party presidential candidates over Biden. But I do understand the frustration with having to vote again for someone I didn’t want the first time and isn’t representative of the direction I want the country to move in besides not wanting to be in a fascist theocracy.

[-] LordR@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

That is a fair point. The primary system as well as the election system as a whole should probably reformedbut that is nearly impossible without flipping a lot of States.

I'm from Switzerland and we had a similar voting system for a long time. It was only changed by implementing more ways for the populace to directly decide about matters in both the Cantons (States) and Switzerland as a whole. So this might be a good way to implement change as it gives people a specific matter to vote on.

In Switzerland it was made possible by populists that wanted a more direct democracy.
So I hope something like this is possible for the US as well as many things like legalized weed, abortion access, a good health insurance system or voting reforms often have a stable majority among the voters, they just don't vote accordingly.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I hope so too, at this point I’m at a loss, based on my general observations about my country as a whole I don’t see any way that the changes the world desperately needs will happen because of the structure of our government alongside the culture of individualism that has led to the communal alienation we have for each other now. I don’t like how hopeless I’ve become but looking at things from a high level things are pretty bleak

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

The primaries are mostly determined by the parties. There will be a primary this year in New Hampshire where only the Republican result counts, because they Democrats reordered their primary schedule so New Hampshire wasn't first and New Hampshire has a law saying they must hold theirs first. So their vote will happen but just doesn't count.

In the end it's the parties that decide who their nominee will be, by the rules they make up, so that's where reform needs to happen.

[-] LordR@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Then vote for politicans that you think will change that or advocate for direct democracy, join a union, strike there are many ways to get more political influence!

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

I'm not responding to say it can't change, I'm explaining you how the primary half of the problem works. Changing a private organization is potentially easier than changing a law, but at the same time does not have a definite method of voting on it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

I want to vote to change the voting system. We deserve to vote for who we trust with the job rather than against the candidate we fear most.

I have to compartmentalize pretty hard each election cycle. I wish I had time to campaign for a voting system change, but I haven't.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Should have been Bernie. SMH

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

It won't work. Conceding the already filled chair is seen as a weakness and they will parade that thought around. We know better, but they will not let the Dems live it down. It's the Dem nomination in 28 that matters. This year is Joe and maybe Trump. Depending on the stupidity of the Reps.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

That would nearly guarantee a win for Trump. Incumbency advantage is strong as is name recognition. I don't like Biden either but he's better than a literal fascist. If Trump wins in 2024 there will not be an election in 2028.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
176 points (88.6% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS