632

We interrupt your programming rule (slrpnk.net)

submitted 10 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

You mean the micro USB 3.0 v1 which was backwards compatible with micro usb. That's right you could use the new fangled USB 3.0 port and cable and get those speeds as well as charging rate. Or....... Use a bog generic USB micro USB 2.0 cable and it would still fit on one side of the port and was still useable for USB 2.0 speeds and charging rates.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

But I concede that it is one of the worst and most delicate ports ever stuck on something expected to have a plug jammed in it literally a thousand times.