436
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nothingcorporate@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago

I'm worried that they DID know, and are using this as an excuse to further their agenda against Palestinians.

[-] migo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 year ago

With the Netanyahu government, that's the more plausible explanation.

[-] Flyswat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Well, it really did work in the US. This is literally what happened at Pearl Harbor.

Roosevelt knew the attack was coming, very much so, our intelligence was good. But he needed the attack to happen, so he let it happen.

At the time, Europe was at war and our allies desperately needed help, but the US had been dragging it's heels about getting involved for years. Roosevelt wanted to enter the war and support our allies, but congress just didn't want to make the official declaration of war. But after the attack on Pearl harbor, that declaration came in short order, just as Roosevelt knew it would.

[-] Infraggable@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is untrue. This is a false conspiracy theory that people keep repeating that has no facts to back it up. This one bugs me because my grandfather was in the merchant Marines and was stationed there when this happened. People parroting that untrue fact drove him bonkers.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is untrue

Which part?

Did the people stationed there get warned? Did merchant Marines have access to top brass intelligence reports? Did Roosevelt have a different motivation? Did Pearl Harbor not happen...?

[-] Infraggable@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The whole "Rosevelt knew claim". It is one of those false clames that gets repeated so often.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem with claiming the opposite, are things like Patton's pretty much spot on prediction of the attack, the fact that intelligence at the time was routed through Washington, with capability to break the Japanese codes, or the still not declassified documents relating some pre-attack intercepts.

It all suggests that Roosevelt, and/or his staff, had all the pieces to figure out what was going to happen. Whether they didn't, or did and decided to do nothing, and the lack of proof either way... is what makes the conspiracy theory keep being a possible conspiracy theory. 🤷

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

is what makes the conspiracy theory keep being a possible conspiracy theory. 🤷

Conspiracy theories continuing to be conspiracy theories requires no causation, because spurious theorizing in general sits outside of logic and reason.

We still have lots of assholes who think the earth being round is a conspiracy pushed on us by big science or whatever, or that "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" (presumably they don't understand how kindling works), or that 5g causes COVID, and even bizarrely that COVID is both a Chinese conspiracy at the same time as it is a hoax and/or harmless.

Conspiratorial thinking isn't driven by reason, logic, or facts. It's tolerated most by people who have no issues with and/or sense of cognitive dissonance. It's more similar to a distributed form of cultism. It's one of creativity's awful cousins.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You're conflating "conspiratorial thinking" with "conspiracy theories".

Conspiracies are a real thing, they happen all the time (and most are punishable by law); conspiratorial thinking is people coming up with, and believing, conspiracies no matter how impossible they are, which is way different from actual conspiracies.

"Conspiracy theories" just happens to be a term that can be used in both cases, it doesn't mean all of them are impossible.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nah, I'm not.

Conspiratorial thinking is what gives you the bunkum conspiracy theories, and the evidence or lack thereof has nothing to do with their production.

As far as I can tell from my reading they come more from an environment of distrust often combined with disordered thinking.

Sure there can be actual conspiracies, but they also usually come with accompanying evidence and more than hunches, hindsight, or temporally related events.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure there can be actual conspiracies, but they also usually come with accompanying evidence and more than hunches, hindsight, or temporally related events.

Evidence is what turns a "conspiracy theory" into either a "proven conspiracy" or a "debunked conspiracy". Without the former, there would be none of the latter... not sure how is that hard to understand.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Still waiting for the actual, solid evidence behind your conjecture.

See the thing is that logical thinking follows the evidence rather than jumping to conclusions.

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

That’s sadly a possibility.

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

What was the prior situation with the reservists? Did they backtrack on their no show threats before the war broke or was the war what forced them to show up

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
436 points (88.1% liked)

News

23296 readers
928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS