this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2026
150 points (96.9% liked)

World News

58598 readers
2690 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This country is fucked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's also not good to force others to execute someone.

It either gives them PTSD or gives them a lust for more murdering.

Bad either way.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is an interesting fact I remember reading about firing squads.

There was a custom (possibly still is) where the squad was handed a random selection of normal and blank rounds before the execution, the point was to prevent anyone from knowing who actually fired the killing shots.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

From what I read online though it's possible to tell if you fire a gun with a normal bullet vs a blank. Especially if you've fired a gun before, which I assume most of the people doing the execution have.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are correct. The recoil is completely different.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And the targets head doesn't split open like a watermelon.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, also don't they look different?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

Firing squads aren't forced. They ask for volunteers. And for this guy, they'll probably have to hold a lottery.

Still, this is just another distraction from the dumpster fire that is the 47th presidency.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

sorta hard not to. someone sticking the needle in or working the contraption. no matter how much you automate someone is going to be the last human thing that instigates the process. I mean in a scary dystopic thing (which face it is like how we have been going for awhile) there would be a robot or something that activates on a schedule based on the current court ruling. that pretty much puts it at the judge or jury at that point.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Have you considered... not having the person executed at all?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

of course. im anti death penalty.

[–] Seralth@piefed.seralth.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Banishment can be a much worse punishment than execution.

There's also just throwing them in a dark small room for 40 years.

There's plenty of things far worse than death to punish people with if your just looking to be cruel.

Death penalty like this is just a state level pr stunt and propaganda basically. Since other methods aren't as catchy headlines.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But someone makes the robot. Ultimately it falls on someone.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

yeah. good point. did not even think of that. I often wonder how people feel who work at plants making military weapons. I kinda assume the are the ultra nationalist type who believe they are protecting freedom.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Bruh my vet was crying when she delivered the fatal injection to my dog. Anyone with an ounce of humanity understands what they're doing.

I'm conflicted. On the one hand I believe if they're going to carry out barbaric practices that there should be a heavy conscience behind every approval and the actual execution. On the other hand, I'm sure there's a list of bloodthirsty psychopaths chomping at the bit to kill someone in a legal frame.

Ideally this practice would just be banned, but we are unfortunately still stuck in the stupid ages

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I think that is an issue with the injection. Im not sure if its compatible with the hippocratic oath and I think you have less proficient folks orgnizing and doing it.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think that sort of thing is usually a volunteer detail, so I don’t imagine they’d force someone if there’s people willing to do it.

I personally wouldn’t have an issue shooting this particular guy.