this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
119 points (91.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

5073 readers
440 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did he say “Han supremacy is okay”, or did he say that Tibet was historically a feudalist society with a cast system and slavery?

[–] waltersf@bookwyr.me 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Does that mean Tibetans should be colonized and homogenized?

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Tibet wasn't colonized, its people were liberated. The people of Tibet were not "homogenized" as they still practice their language and customs. You know history only through the lens of imperialism, and it shows.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think it’s probably a little from column “A” and a little from column “B”…China did invade and annex Tibet against the will of the inhabitants, and it’s pretty messed up that China is controlling the appointment of the high level Lama’s, and they’re probably disappearing dissidents in typical fashion…but “Han Supremacy” is clearly employed as an inflammatory and divisive term, and it’s probably an overstatement for what has actually gone on.

[–] waltersf@bookwyr.me 1 points 2 weeks ago

Now I want to learn how you liberate a group of people without colonist intentions. Show me anticolonial historical liberations.