Fuck AI

8360 readers

926 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

173

Autonomous strike drone uses Nvidia Jetson Orin Nano to independently pick and bomb targets — Swedish startup's attack drones run small AI model, require no human input and zero external comms (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 1 week ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The demonstrations, license, and funding come before any official NATO procurement order or actual combat deployment. Concerns about lethal autonomous weapons are being addressed by a UN expert group. Its recent report concluded that human judgment and control are required to comply with the laws of war; its recommendations will be reviewed in Geneva in November

Looks like they're going to look into this in November

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh, I will be pleasantly surprised if the same governments whose companies are developing this tech and itching to use it in Ukraine and Palestine support its ban.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope it's not governments that make these decisions

Should be judges, game theory experts, activists, NGO reps, ethics philosophers, etc

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It is governments which sign the Geneva convention, and the "judges, game theory experts, activists, NGO reps, ethics philosophers, etc" they allow/amplify are ultimately further expressions of those governments.

We come back to "everything is political", which is 100x more true for technocratic entities that claim to just be calling balls and strikes.