this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
173 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

8360 readers
926 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Need to update the Geneva convention.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ukraine already admitted to using indiscriminate killer drones in battle, which is a war crime, but no-one seems to care much.

What can we do about it besides sanctions and kinetic war against them? Were doing both..

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 7 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, like the Ottawa Treaty on Landmines, countries at war are going to ditch their commitments to restrict inhumane weapons use at the first opportunity.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The demonstrations, license, and funding come before any official NATO procurement order or actual combat deployment. Concerns about lethal autonomous weapons are being addressed by a UN expert group. Its recent report concluded that human judgment and control are required to comply with the laws of war; its recommendations will be reviewed in Geneva in November

Looks like they're going to look into this in November

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh, I will be pleasantly surprised if the same governments whose companies are developing this tech and itching to use it in Ukraine and Palestine support its ban.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope it's not governments that make these decisions

Should be judges, game theory experts, activists, NGO reps, ethics philosophers, etc

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

It is governments which sign the Geneva convention, and the "judges, game theory experts, activists, NGO reps, ethics philosophers, etc" they allow/amplify are ultimately further expressions of those governments.

We come back to "everything is political", which is 100x more true for technocratic entities that claim to just be calling balls and strikes.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

It's going to be hard to make that argument when those for it can just say: "this helps to reduce the use of combatants, so it saves lives."

But there are efforts https://autonomousweapons.org/global-legal-framework-milestones/