this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
81 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14464 readers
564 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

give them a break

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jorge@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I didn't understand the last sentence:

One of the masking skills I acquired in activists circles was to always check if a level of factuality is needed for struggle purposes

Could you elaborate?

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The masking/social skill is that you double check if your desire for technical correctness is actually needed.

Is it helpful? Is it necessary? Does it advance the cause? Or are you getting hung up on minutiae?

Typically the issue is that the clarification is being discussed at an inconvenient time for the group, and you are interrupting the discussion. If you determine that it is helpful and necessary and does advance the cause, the right move is to come back to it later on in a smaller group or individually to gain clarity. If not, just drop it.

[–] lil_tank@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

When I want to correct someone because they omitted a certain nuance, I ask myself if this error may lead to taking wrong decisions in the future, or if it is a small inaccuracy that isn't worth the debate. It's especially important if the nuance in question will make you look more moderate. Correcting people for not being radical enough is more acceptable in good orgs