this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8668 readers
106 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This man is politically illiterate... I'm reading it and just... Wtf? Does he even know what hes saying? Genuinely, cause like, he starts from an (incorrect) axiom, and then derives inane nonsense based on... Something? I can't figure out his logic. He makes leaps and bounds without anything to inform them, his drivel isnt worth reading I'm stopping after a few paragraphs but good god damn.
Sucks tho. I dont use his packages but people said they were good. Fuck him.
Grey tribe/neoractionary/fascist writing is almost always like this. They don't operate at one level, they're constantly trying to incorporate information at smaller and bigger scales that don't work together: various crime statistics, various anecdotes about women in their life, Greek tragedies, music lyrics, online memes, etc. They create this tapestry that seems convincing because it has all these supporting examples to people who already want to believe but to anyone who's skeptical it's scattered and nonsensical.
I had a friend who wrote like this but fortunately he stuck to episode recaps of Lost, where it was almost appropriate.
I also can't follow his writing; what point is he trying to make exactly? It all just reads like conservative rambling that comes off as very egotistical.
The only package of his I use is Modus themes, but that's because they're included in Emacs.
I read through most of it and totally agree with your analysis. Politically illerate is a nice way to put it, but those conclusions are something else.