this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
53 points (94.9% liked)
chat
8647 readers
155 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The population doesn't really matter if we're playing by bourgeois electoral games. Sanders only represents around 322330 people (because he shares 644663 people with another senator), but he is far more politically relevant than Mamdani because Sanders is a senator while Mamdani is just some mayor. Neither of them have a paramilitary, so their real political power is effectively 0.
on the other hand one mayor has way more of a direct impact on someone's life than one out of 100 senators.
i also don't think
is correct analysis, you vote for each senator separately and give or take deaths, moving, and teens growing up it's the same population this year as it next time ~~and then they represent their donors rather than the public~~
Right I was comparing mayor to mayor