Climate change is already killing people, destabilising nations, eradicating wildlife. Why is it that the only solution you can comprehend is for 30 million households to immediately adopt a 'solution' which the majority manifestly do not need, and would make all of the aforementioned even worse.

Do you not think those lives are worthy of consideration? Or are you suggesting that we should only think about ourselves and our own comfort and convenience - everyone-else be damned - because it really sounds like that's what you're saying.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

i love that you keep putting solution in quotations because you really do think a livable environment is a luxury