this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
82 points (96.6% liked)
Selfhosted
60426 readers
342 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Everyone asks "where do we get more storage?" and not "do we need to hoard all of this?"
The answer is yes.
Seconded.
Because the answer to the second question is a very clear "yes".
Yes. If I want to organize and dedupe what I have then I need enough storage to work on it, a lot of my storage is spinning rust 7-15 years old, and if I have the space I'm going to use it. I have family photos and a music library going back to 2005. Too many things like old games need custom fixes installed to work correctly on modern hardware, and the internet isn't as permanent as it was cracked up to be.
There's plenty of reasons to hold on to older data.
Aren't old games pretty small though? It's new ones that you may need a huge volume to store many of them. Depends how much we are talking of course. 2TB or 50TB?
Depends what era but generally yes. Xbox 360 seem to be in the 3-6GB range, Wii / GameCube in the 1-2GB range. Older gens are ofc smaller.
My entire gaming library is approx 200gb, but it's curated, retro / indy focused (early 2000s to mid 2010's)
TIL Sid Meier's Pirates was released on Wii.
Its a really good version too. My favourite is probably the OG C64 (first love and all that) but the Wii has some real hidden gems.
I have family photos starting in 2001, scanned/captured photos and video going back 50 years, music, and backups of all my Xbox DVDs (WTF is the original Xbox even called today?). But that's a few terrabytes. It can all fit on a few USB sticks. (Which I do as a third level backup.)
The real space killers are the TV shows and movies that I will watch at most once every 20 years. I could delete almost all of it. But I don't. Instead I keep looking for bigger storage options.
I've become much more selective with my video quality. I've found that 480p encoded from a raw source produces pretty acceptable quality, anything that isn't made to be eye candy I'll encode myself from a raw file down to 480p. There have been many things that have been very hard to find, so I feel it's more important that they exist, rather than be in the highest definition possible. Quality of pixels is more important that quantity of pixels.
This really depends on what you're watching it on. 480p can look fine on a phone but like garbage on a 65" OLED. I find that 720p is good for most shows that aren't visually stunning (like Foundation) while most movies look fine in 1080p on the aforementioned OLED.
My Bravia does some magic that makes video files look better than they do on PC. I've started replacing many of my 2160p files with 1080p ones, the difference is often barely noticeable, depending on the quality of the respective rips.
I don't generally go below 720p but some old stuff that hasn't been remastered has no reason to go above 480p.
With how the internet is going, I don't think we will be able to get content from it in 5 to 10 years. It will be completely locked down, so all we have on our drives will be it. Back to mailing DVDs!
Usenet will likely still be around, and torrents are like playing whack-a-mole.
It will just be a lot harder to get to, and likely harsher laws put in place as well.
I mean, not allowing vpns for personal use would stop us all. Businesses would of course be allowed to use them.
Yes and no. We'd go back to sneakernets. :)
... But that would be significantly more unpleasantly limited than the current ways of doing things...
And sneakernets would make personal archives more valuable than ever
I think a big fuel for these storage anxieties is the very real situation we're in right now, where we're watching the "forever Internet" erode and crumble before our eyes, and getting rug-pulled from every direction service-wise, and losing access to media we don't have a hard copy of.
I do wish there were a better way to pool all this storage for a common library of preservation...I mean I guess Internet Archive is like that but they're constantly under attack. All this is under heaps of legal "gray area" and obviously the media titans want to force a rental-only-own-nothing world.
Right now we kinda have to become a scattered group of amateur historians and librarians, to preserve our culture.
I don't say this to be mean so please don't take it this way, but I think this mentality is... privileged? If the free internet goes then so does society as we know it, and the obscure french film collections from the 80s isn't gonna do anything for you in that new reality. The things that need to be prepped are plain text and take up no space at all, in the grand scheme of things. It is feasible to self-host a text-only version of the entirety of Wikipedia, but nobody here is talking about that. It's as if people think there's gonna be some middle-ground where the internet is totally shut down and somehow life goes on as normal. You'd think priorities would shift a little away from media consumption towards "oh shit how do I learn how to filter my water".
It would sure suck if you were the only person on earth with that french film collection, but do any historians actually know how to reach you? Have you made this information available? If not, then your archive is not useful.
Well, okay, you're talking "end of the free and open Internet" which, yeah, would be a pretty big and terrible deal, and I really hope people and institutions that are able, are archiving such important things! (I should see how big that Wikipedia archive is for kicks lol). But yeah, we'd have much bigger problems.
We gotta support archive.org and our libraries for this reason! I would hate to be without them.
I personally wasn't talking about digital "prepping" so much as I was talking about motivations for hoarding data of things we're interested in. Our media becoming lost media because wealthy interests don't give a crap or, worse, decided to censor it.
Not everyone is just hoarding Sailor Moon episodes; people have tons of books and manuals too just because it interests them. Lots of people preserve video game ROMs as well, which has thankfully kept those works from disappearing entirely.
Moving that information would become significantly more difficult without a free and open Internet, but that's a different "threat model" worth its own conversation, I think.
For what you're talking about. I bet you'd be interested in someone like Marion Stokes , for instance, who "data hoarded" tons of recordings of television news, and that archive actually proved useful to historians way later.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment and perspective. :)
This has been my thinking for the very longest while. If/When the internet goes 'somewhere', commerce screeches to a halt, globally. We're at a point where there is no going back to pen and paper. When commerce screeches to a halt, no one is going to be gunning for your NAS drive filled with movies. They will be gunning for whatever life sustaining resources you have to make theirs. You think people are crazy now.......we've yet to plumb the depths of crazy.
The answer is 42.
yes
We wouldn't be here if we hadn't already answered the second question affirmatively.
Yeah, the *Arr stack has effectively eliminated the need to permanently retain media. I want to watch something? I just request it, and 10-20 minutes later it is available on my server. I tend to treat *Arr requests the same way I used to treat Blockbuster trips. It takes a few minutes to get what you want to watch, but that’s also a chance to make some popcorn, grab a beer, and settle in.
I only (“only”) keep ~25-30TB of media available at any one moment. And even that is plenty. It’s literally hundreds of movies and TV shows. And if I want to purge old content, that’s easy to do too. Hell, I can even sort by the last time it was watched, and start with the shit that hasn’t been touched in like 18 months.
Same, I fight the consumerist urge to ~~catch them all~~ keep everything, but instead shoot for a lower need to purchase more and consume more hardware. Electricity is cheap where I live, so downloading, then deleting shows that I and my household are unlikely to watch again for many years just makes more sense.
People treat deleting like some dirty word, but all good collections need to be organized and pruned.
You don’t even necessarily need to delete either. If you have a ton of H.264 video you could convert it to 265 or AV1 with minimal quality loss, but huge space savings.
If you torrent that means stopping seeding tho
My only complaint is that lots of my streaming devices don’t natively support newer codecs. So if I convert everything to AV1, my server will end up transcoding basically everything. Smart TVs are particularly bad about supporting anything past h264.
I really want to go AV1 too. Most of what I play is airplayed from my ipad to whatever so I only need my iPad to support it. But I'm not buying an iPad air just to airplay AV1.
But H265 has been prevalent for about 10 years now so basically any smart TV made in the last 3 years should support it. And if yours don't then any el cheapo smart tv stick should.
if you are also annoyed qbout the tracking and ads shit smart TVs pull off, you could by a mini-PC to fix all of these at once. making an IR remote work will be challenging, but if you go for plasma bigscreen, you can control it fine with kde connect on your phone.
I block all of my smart TVs at the DNS level with my pi-holes. All of the benefits (native streaming apps, easy casting, a functional remote without any fuss, etc) without any of the ads or tracking.
I'm not sure if tracking can be fully disabled with DNS blocking. they could easily implement DoH usage or direct IP connections as fallback
What you don't want to hold onto The Wrecking Crew for your descendants?