this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
423 points (95.3% liked)

memes

21619 readers
1182 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I never said anything against the human activity of learning

Honestly seeing this level of "rhetoric" is just... well I'm just bored arguing kids/idiots like you. You can't actually stand behind your words, so you try to make it personal.

No, you haven't "triggered" anything by wording your comment poorly, but like I said, instead of just saying "oh right you are, that wording does indeed have that implication, I'll word it better" you're going all out on these pathetic ad hominems. Which is a term I'm 85% sure you're gonna misuse due to fundamentally misunderstanding it.

Being in the vicinity of information --> gifted the chance to absorb/learn/remember it.

Hahaha dude you do crack me up. You've never heard of willfull ignorance, or can't imagine it's opposite? I pity you.

Trivia nerds won't know what random number I'm thinking of.

Yeah uhm does that mean that they don't exist and/or have a much larger grasp of a million different little things than someone who's wasted their life thinking information just randomly spawns into you, so they didn't bother actively learning anything.

But you just wanted to argue (my use of the word gift) like a master debater & extended my simple point into wannabe *"this guy doesn't appreciate ppl's efforts & thinks learning is fake

That's known as a strawman my little silly-billy. And it's just like I said. You literally can not say "my mistake, I could've worded that better" you've made this be some sort of contest.

It's really not. If it were, you wouldn't stand a chance with, again, that childish level of rhetoric.

I think I've deeply triggered your traumas of getting beat hard in all the quizzes you've ever taken (I don't think you're really the type to play Trivial Pursuit, lolololol.) And that's okay. Learning is good. Like learning to handle your personal emotions and feelings of inferiority.

Which is what you're having a complex about here, because I'm just pointing out your original wording did in fact imply that you think all information we have was "gifted by random chance".

Being mean doesn't equate to an ad hominem, by the way. Neither do insults. They're not synonyms, which you'd know if you had ever spent any time actually learning about them. But you didn't. Perhaps you thought "random chance" would just plop it in your head one day? RUAHAHAHA :D

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Come back to Earth, ppl might miss you.
(Also, we have books!)

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly what I mean. I've seen this tantrum a million times. Your ego just can't handle admitting you have made a mistake. So you'll keep pretending you didn't, despite not having the balls to actually argue the point, because you know you did imply with your wording that all experience is "randomly gifted".

And to do that, you start of with pathetic attempts at ad hominems. (Which again, isn't synonymous with "insult".)

No matter how much I keep reiterating that my point is simply your poor wording, you can't accept it as such, and get so disturbed that you first try your shitty rhetoric and when it doesn't work, you change into silly oneliners like that, because you think replying even something completely irrelevant, will somehow make you "get the last word" and you think that's "winning".

But it won't affect your wording and it's implications. It's really not a lot to say "lol I made a mistake, poor wording, yeah", unless you're completely convinced you never make mistakes. Which you'll ofc argue against, while constantly avoiding the actual subject of your poor wording.

Then in like a few days you'll devolve to spamming "k" or something. Genuinely, seen this thousands of times.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

See, defaulting to oneliners, because you literally can't address the subject of why you're in the thread, but your childish ego still forces you to reply something. Just like I said, and will continue saying. You're not gonna "win" this, I'll just keep reminding you of your publicly childish behaviour while you keep replying with a single line and smiley, because you're so ashamed.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Omg, but I only came here to "win"! Noo!!

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Just like I said. You simply can't just say "maybe it wasn't the best wording, my mistake".

Instead you publicly make yourself an idiot by dancing exactly to my tune. Just like I said, you're unable to address anything.

The fact that you keep doing that sort of proves me right. ;>

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Just like I said. You simply can’t just say “maybe it wasn’t the best wording, my mistake”.

except evil_shrubbery did say that. several comments and something like ten hours ago. they just didn't say that in the exact words you are demanding. is there a reason you want to have an argument?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

No they didn't. They pretend to have said that.

It's like apologising to someone by saying "I'm sorry you think you deserve an apology" and then arguing "I already apologised actually" after implicitly stating that the other person didn't in fact even deserve an apology. Meaning that they're not actually sorry for anything, because "sorry you think you deserve an apology" isn't actually a real apology, is it?

I can see how someone wouldn't see the difference. If you're having problems, please ask for help.