this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
653 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7307 readers
3257 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 110 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sadly I have generally watched in horror as my friends quote Gemini slop as fact checking on the regular, because it's the default search result.

I speak up about it, and explain why it's problematic. Doesn't matter. It's convenient.

Convenience always wins.

We're cooked.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

my friends

Pls convince them otherwise.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Nah, they're cooked. Only ones going against this stupid machine worship are those who actually touch grass.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I know people that will complain about the crappy results but then not use a different search engine. Like it's too much cognitive load to go to duckduckgo or qwant or whatever

[–] Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

To be fair, duck duck go also has some garbage results compared to like 2015 google. I have used ddg for the past several years and many topics yield terrible results. I was "the good googler" amongst my peers at the time. I haven't tried qwant, so it might be better. A lot of search engines are worse and I'm guessing it's partially because the web is just bloated with trash now.

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

I downloaded the Wikipedia app - I usually end up there anyway, just now I just cut to the chase.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks DDG search is dogshit

I've been using StartPage, and the results are generally much better (though I think they are technically taken from Google, so...)

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

A lot of search engines are worse and I’m guessing it’s partially because the web is just bloated with trash now.

That's sadly a big part of it. Other is that search engines in general are worse today as everything apparently needs to be AI. Google spesifically has gotten worse over the years, but it's not alone. And that indirectly affects other engines, like duckduck, which at least partly uses other engines at the background.

But with DDG bangs are pretty neat. If you don't find what you're looking for via DDG search just add '!g' to the query and you'll get same search from Google. Or pick from "a few" other engines with their own bangs.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Even today's Google (if you use an adblocker) is still much better results than Duckduckgo from my experience. I use ddg first, but I often have to resort to Google if the results are shit.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Check out Start Page.

Uses Google results, but it doesn't track or profile you

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm, makes me wonder if a big factor is that it reads the first couple of results and summarizes it. Like if it was turned off, people wouldn't bother clicking through and reading, so they just leave and and "fact" get saved in their brains

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This was always a thing. The results on page 1 had a much greater click rate than on page 2+

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

That used to be a direct result of how good the search was. In the aughts it was generally on page 1 or you had to rephrase your query; the remaining results were the era’s equivalent of ‘slop’, link trees and redirect rabbit holes and plaintext sites with random stolen content. I was met with genuine surprise any time I found what I was looking for on page 3 or 4

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, old search was just better

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm wondering if SEO just got better and search is harder.