Absolutely agree. I keep seeing so many takes where they are ignoring that they specifically stated it was competing in the PC market, not the console market. I don't see it being less than $800. Id expect $1000+
Baylahoo
joined 2 years ago
Take another look at the controller info. They have finger tracking and it looks like you can add accessories that will let you open your hand without dropping them.
You can keep your walls and apple can let other people take those walls down. It could easily be a win/win. If they did that, they would capture a lot of android market.
Seems like there's some correlation with your average Florida Man and many of them seem to belong in an institution too.
I am also curious about the answer, but either way that can't be seen as acceptable for such an expensive graphics card.
I'm not a medical professional, but I've seen breakdowns of similar wounds. I think this can be compared to being shot in the heart. It creates a massive blood pressure increase that my guess in this case causes the brain to react with fencing. I've read that the pressure spike can be the cause of death before blood even leaves the body. Either that or some side effect of damaging the brain stem.
The entire problem is that people like Charlie are specifically hating people who are doing nothing wrong and being neutral. I completely agree with you. He is the agitator. It shows you who the bad guys are when you see who they root against.
No, no, no. These weapons pale in comparison to basic infantry in the modern military. Not only are they way overkill for anything a law abiding citizen should ever need for recreation, they would also be useless in the case of a 2nd Amendment related coup of the corrupt government.
Star Wars is one of those franchises that depend on ideas like this. Thank you doing your part soldier! 🫡
I've already seen a pretty big YouTuber cover that they are targeting GTA 6 now. It was either moistcritical or mudahar
I agree with this a lot. The people who are the issue have no code of ethics that aligns with the Bible to yield a communal good outcome. They use it for a personal good outcome. Therefore, we would be arguing on completely different terms where we are each picking and choosing parts that we like to defend our opinion while ignoring the other side's same logic. This makes the source material valueless because it has no consistency throughout its teachings where the two parties differ the most.
view more: next ›
I think they are saying reading those books are the reason.