this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
934 points (99.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
11591 readers
1750 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This was in California. My American history teacher was a confederate defender. Marked it partial credit to say the Civil War was fought over slavery. Full credit for the answer "states rights." Fully wrong when I said "states rights for its citizens to own people like property." His ignorance was astounding even to my 17 year old self. When I recognized the joke I was dealing with, I treated the class like a joke.
Mr. Angle, I remember you and your bullshit.
I mean bros last name was Angle. He was destined for failure
Explain Kurt Angle then!
Lookie here, it's just the way the cookie tear
Prepare to be hurt and mangled, like Kurt Angle: rookie year
He bent the other direction.
Mr Angle sounds obtuse
did the news write it as "angel"? or is that a british thing
Morning, Angle.
Probably a tiny town thing when that happens,wiith some dude that looked like Bond owning the grocery store. Hah like anyone that could play Bond just owning a store in a small town staffed with the Mountain, just having a laugh now. Next thing I'll hear is the angel dude is Scotty....did look like a lovely town mind you. I could go for a Cornetto. Think it was pretty similar to what my dad used to buy me as a treat growing up in Canada many many moons ago now.
I guess his perspective on history was at a wrong "Angle" haha
He's right though, the core issue was state vs federal sovereignty over internal matters which apart from slavery (yes, the biggest issue) also included tariffs and infrastructure investment (oh how times don't change)
When you frame it that way you make it sound like slavery was not the most pressing factor on everyone's mind.
If this was unintentional, go read either speeches from the time or the declarations of succession from the southern states.
Slight correction: secession, not succession.
That is all. Good work.
I literally said slavery was the biggest issue, but good to see you read straight past that
This is lost cause propaganda. The confederacy split because of slavery first, every thing was a later justification. The first usage of the term "states rights" wasn't until after the war was over.
Not that bringing this up in isolation to other facts isn't propaganda, an encroachment onto the rights of the state of South Carolina was their stated reason for seccession.
Were the rights they were upset over racist? Absolutely. Were they contradictory? Well, it calls out the fugitive slave act explicitly, so in my opinion, another yes.
They were always racist pieces of shit. However! The states' rights argument has been there since the near beginning. A right to support a horrific tragedy, but still, let's be factual in our contempt. There really is no need to embellish when the evidence is already that damning.
He was not. The confederates said exactly why the started the war in their declarations and it was, in fact, slavery.
There was no formal declaration of war, what declarations are you referring to?
Different person, but I would assume that they meant each of the state's declarations of secession. Which, yeah, didn't really mince words.
These? https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states
I agree they are clear and don't mince words. They are centered on state vs federal government rights due to:
Unless your state wanted the right not to have slavery, the Confederacy wouldn't allow that
Union states with slavery reading this o_0
Someone better go back in time and tell the authors of the Confederate states' Declarations of Causes for Secession:
Oops...
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#Mississippi
So go on about how the Civil War wasn't about slavery, dawg
But it was about slavery, it was about whether or not the federal government have the right to ban slavery.