this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
144 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21510 readers
1122 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Battle" is usually meant figuratively when fighting wildfires.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Some people I know have remained friendly with some conspiracy theorists since Covid (I just stopped interacting when they told me I’d be dead by 2022 because I received the vaccine) and I’ve heard that one of the current theories is that the government is starting the wildfires for some reason.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Close. It's (often) government funded utility companies.

And the reason is nefarious: invest as little in infrastructure as possible to maximize profits.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It depends on the theory. I'm a "Bigfoot", "ufo" (none of this new shit, weather balloons and probes only!), and "Kubrick left the original set for the moon landing filming conspiracy on the moon" conspiracy theories only. Regular conspiracy theorists scare me

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 7 points 10 hours ago

forced burns are a forest fire management tactic.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's to force states to start raking their forests.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What's worse is the thought that forests can't take care of themselves absent human involvement. These huge fires are because humans artificially prevented the natural cycle of fires for more than a century. Now with so much built up overgrowth, it is out of control.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So can we rake it and use it what we collect for anything useful?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I think people do that already :D

[–] Little1Lost@gehirneimer.de 4 points 14 hours ago

tecnically the us gov does start some (in)directly through cuts in funding

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

For oil profits.

I mean that’s not what the conspiracy nuts will tell you, they “researched” the cover story. Also, it’s kind of a side-effect instead of an intended thing, but…yeaahhhh