this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
358 points (97.4% liked)

3DPrinting

22619 readers
230 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 87 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep. It's a shame. The overall product is great. But the violation and abuse of the AGPL is unacceptable.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Violation of *GPL is bread and butter for most of 3D printer companies, locking out users out of features they paid for and used is terrible though.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If only a Prusa XL didn't cost more than my car...

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Use your XL to print a new car. Problem solved.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In fact I would download a car.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

The MK4S costs more than my car.That's not an argument against PRUSA.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Which is why I did not write „all”. I had Prusa specifically in mind. It’s a shame they have to compete with companies that do not follow the rules as much as they do.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not trying to be argumentative, genuinely wanting to learn. What other violations have there been (or are there currently)?

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ender 3s originally used Marlin has that changed? I thoughtKlipper required too much processing for the simpler printers like Enders.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The Ender 3 V3 has pretty much nothing in common with the Ender 3, other than the name and that it's a bed slinger

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

KE and SE too I think

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

An 8 year old blog post from a resale store linking to a website that no longer exists... It doesn't offer a ton of clarity :/

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

There are far more bountiful resources to be found, including GitHub issues with concrete examples. I picked that one because I know that all four of the companies listed are problematic. I do not currently have the time to find more detailed links, but they're out there.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 4 points 3 days ago
[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 3 days ago

Violation of *GPL is bread and butter for most of CHINESE 3D printer companies