this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
324 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
84643 readers
5791 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not AI that's the problem. AI is an amazingly powerful tool (I'm an AI researcher).
The problem is that it's in the hands of psychotic technofascist greedy subhumans that want to destroy basically all of society so their stock can go up 0.001%. If we can cut out the source of the cancer, the body can begin to heal itself.
Right! If you don't count the mass surveillance boost, the autonomous killing machines they're trying to make, the environmental impact, the pillaging of our individual experiences, and the destruction of all our shared spaces online, AI is a pretty cool tool.
Narrator: actually, no it was not.
e.g. it still spreads misinformation.
I was excited about the idea of purpose-built systems trained on specific datasets to be help find complex patterns to diagnose diseases or suggest potential molecules for specific purposes.
Then the LLM shit started and everyone started fantasizing about intelligent "AI" just because it was able to reproduce patterns of language that seem relevant to a given input. Some of those funding it kept chasing that dream and are convinced that, if they just throw more compute at the problem, they can evolve the renaissance AGI that can do anything. Then they can fire every worker and be bazillionaires with robot slaves and never have to work another day of their lives... and fuck everyone and everything else.
It's amazing what we can ruin when we let greed and selfishness drive our society.
At 1million i could already stop working and live decent life :/. I really don't get why past 1billion they continue to search for more
Maybe it's because I've only ever had at most a comfortable income but I truly don't understand the mentality of needing so much money.
I don't get paid as much as my peers but I make enough to be comfortable. I am my own department and, aside from emergencies and other high priority situations, I manage myself and choose what to work on when. I have a decent work life balance. Because I make enough to be comfortable (in large part because my landlord promised not to raise our rent - early in the COVID lockdown - if we were "good tenants" and has managed to keep true to her word) I don't feel the need for more. That balance is worth than making the 20% more a year I might get somewhere else because I can't guarantee I won't have a shitty boss that doesn't let me have that work/life balance.
They actually have a disorder or disease. However in this case their disorder is destroying the rest of the world. There's a fast approaching point that the world organism will self-heal to prevent its own death.
It's a sickness
They've been fantasizing about that ever since "computers" started growing in accessibility - in the 1960s....
The current crop is just the first time such things have been delivered with something resembling "average" human responses.
Fantasizing wasn't the best choice of words - I often understate what I mean to communicate at an attempt at humor. I should have said "everyone started ~~fantasizing~~ becoming so obsessed with intelligent “AI” that they're willing to dump a significant portion of the world's resources just because... "
That's more or less what I meant by "patterns of language that seem relevant to a given input". I was attempting to understate this in order to exaggerate the villainous eagerness and stupidity of greedy, rich fucks.
The late 90s .com bubble was very eye opening for me.
Top 1% (and up) wealthy people I have known often think in terms of "getting to the next level" - and no matter where you are, there's always a next level. Even the wealthiest people in the world aren't the most powerful in various circles, the most popular, the most well liked, the most beautiful... there's always that next unattainable step to vie for.
When there's a chaotic upheval, like .com, or AI, that's opportunity to reposition - and as many of these people are older, YOLO - they'll put significant capital at risk to try - especially those wealthy enough to make siginificant plays with less than 10% or less than 1% of their current net worth...
During .com, starting programmers' salaries doubled within less than a year - pretty much directly as a result of this opening of the powerful people's wealth hoardes putting them in competition with each other to hire everyone they could who could help them try to capitalize "on that .com stuff."
We were "seeking investment" before .com hit, after it hit investment was seeking us: satellite calls with guys from their yachts in the South Pacific... wild times.
Once you hit the 0.01% most wealthy, it's beyond "villainous eagerness and stupidity of greedy, rich fucks." it's more of a free-for-all among those players for how they might get to the next level, or be passed by by others who climb while they stagnate. 0.001% of 8 billion, or even 350 million, is still a LOT of people.
The lack of regulation of AI is absolutely a serious problem, there are so many problems your comment isn't even funny.
Problems with people using it for health advice.
Problems with teens using it instead of friends.
Problems with AI giving absurdly incorrect advice to people in general, but also professionals like managers and CEO's.
Problems with data-centers that host these AI systems require enormous amounts of power. So much researchers have shown these data centers are drying up vast areas around the centers.
The techno-fascists are in all sorts of business, that's not special for AI. The problem is with AI the techno-fascists aren't regulated in any way.
Neither how their data centers impact the environment and the electric grid, or how AI has actual bad effects for their customers, because there is no regulation on the use of AI.
Is it? I keep hearing people keep parroting this but what big advancements have we made cause of AI?
As a developer, I keep hearing this but all I see is low quality software that is all smoke and mirrors. Pumping out low quality code at a high pace is worse than pumping out less but higher quality code.
Dude, ChatGPT just solved an Erdős problem a few days ago and Mythos is exploiting decade old undiscovered 0-days in OSes and capable of pivoting 0-day Firefox bugs into full blown root access.
Yeah, I get that the viral "how many 'r's are in strawberry" stuff is funny, but the idea that historical issues with transformers is preventing them from accelerating peak capabilities way beyond what most experts thought was possible just years ago is borderline delusional.
The field is moving so fast at this point that if you are basing any sense of limitations on even ~2mo old sampling, your conclusions are likely out of date.
They aren't a silver bullet for everything (yet) but how capable they are at the things transformers are starting to be specialized into is well past the avg practitioner.
I've been writing software for well over a decade and the modern agents do a better job than I would around 90% of the time. Yes, I'll occasionally need to bring up issues with their work, but I'd say at this point around 50% of the times I think they made a mistake I was actually the one who was wrong.
This is only within around the last 3-4 months that it's been like this.
Dude, it's not even worth it. These crazy people want to live in their own realities. No matter how much you explain something, they'll continue to believe what they want to feel morally superior, even if it's completely naive.
Oh did it solve it? You didn’t really provide any sources so I had to look it up myself.
And in the example from 2 days ago, it just applied an existing formula in a different context.
Which is helpful for sure, but I wouldn’t say it solves it.
Indeed.
To cut off their data and revenue streams, stick to Open Source, locally run, models/chatbots.
I want to agree with you, but AI is just another psychopath in a world where we don't need any more psychopaths.
It’s amazing how open source has benefitted the individual. The monopolization of compute is still a barrier we’ll have to crash through
-is an AI researcher -immediately uses Nazi lingo after introducing themselves
you can't be more obvious than this about the ideology of AI💀
lol get offline a bit, not everything is Nazi everything. You're saying "subhuman" is Nazi coded?
I believe Peter Thiel, Musk, Andreeson, Horowitz, Yarvin, and about 100 others who are actively trying to erode our society to the point of collapse, so they can rise as god-kings from the ashes, need to not exist in our free society. They have broken the inherent social contract and have therefore lost the privilege.
gee maybe people like you shouldn't have put those tools into the shitbag's hands?
I remember a decade ago multiple movements to reign in AI before it became uncontrollable, and any chance of that is long fuckin gone. we're gonna barrel forward heedless of the danger, because fuck you that guy wants profits and doesn't care about humanity.
and people like you made the tools and gave it to 'em.
That seems terribly extreme. Its not like its a bomb that is obviously for blowing people up. Someone made something with some cool applications, then some guys with many times more money and resources than anyone should be allowed to have, took the idea and ran with it toward a bunch of psychotic ends.
The problem isn't that people can use good things for bad purposes, nor is it the people that make or improve those things. The root cause is that western society is currently structured in a way that ends up rewarding certain types of madness, and the reward structure is set up such that individuals can get a vast undue amount of influence and power. Under these conditions, it is natural that even a tiny number of such individuals can overtake the system like a single cancer cell can eventually kill someone. All of these alarming things going on for over 60 years are symptoms of that societal illness. Please don't blame scientists for sciencing.
It's cute that you think you're somehow different