184

This is almost too sad to dunk on. People running the world have never had a reflective conversation with a professional trained to help process emotions and healthily cope with the human condition. They're in charge of billions of dollars worth of resources and guiding society's investment into the future. Cooooool

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

It's asking me to sign in and I don't wnat to make an account

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is an Angel Investor, worked at Meta and Dropbox before OpenAI

Climbed to staff engineer within 4 years (typical is like 8+ years?), which is the lowest level where coders switch from working class to PMC, and also a level most never reach

Real hustle grindset shit

[-] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Staff at 4 YOE screams hyperinflated job title and/or nepotism to me. Even the craziest grindset pod people I've worked with couldn't pull that off legitimately.

[-] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

They do have a PhD. May have given them some level of seniority or early boost compared to peers? A "8 years of relevant experience" type situation where 4 of them are the PhD. I don't know how seriously that's taken compared to direct experience and immediate work product in the industry, though.

[-] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Ah, the PhD would get you fast tracked to at least senior so that makes more sense. I'm grumpy about PhDs getting fast tracked though; in my experience academia is a shit show for programming standards and they tend to end up leading teams that are massive problem children. I'm in DevOps though so I'm heavily biased.

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

Nah, companies mostly just treat a PHD as an extra two years of work experience.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She does have PhD so probably started mid level instead of entry

I also thought inflation but checked levels.fyi and apparently it's slightly deflated lmao

[-] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

I'm not an engineer so it's not like I'm personally offended by this, but I always bristle at the stolen valor of using "engineer" in the job title. Fucking programmers (glorified logic nerds) trying to fool gullible investors and the public into thinking of them in a more respectable light by ripping off the prestige of an entirely dissimilar and unrelated field. It's not even that they don't deserve some semblance of respect for their work (if it was actually being used for prosocial development instead of facilitating ever greater exploitation and monetizing attention spans), but they don't deserve to be conflated with engineers who, generally speaking, are always contributing towards something tangible and arguably beneficial in the world. (Except for designers of like, hostile architecture or planned obsolescence and stuff like that)

[-] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

Not a bad take at all, but there are legitimately programmers out there that do work equitable to real engineering, mostly in aerospace or core-level banking. The industry at large plays so fast and loose with everything it'd be ridiculous to call typical webshit 'engineering' without making anyone who has to go through getting permits to do their job break out into hives.

[-] livestreamedcollapse@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

A mechE recently told me "Become an engineer! Every scientist eventually becomes one."

Tired of these Dunning Kruger cases encroaching into every field thinking they're god's gift unto invention (no standing on shoulders of giants for these brain geniuses) because they cheated through linear algebra & slept through a 1 credit ethics class.

[-] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

pushing back on this. whether something is "engineering" depends on the character of the work, not the effect on the world. I used to think it was stolen valor, and called myself a programmer or software developer, but most engineers who become programmers view it as a (new, cowboy, kind of fucked up) field of engineering. There is even some explicit task overlap at the fringes, especially in robotics and microelectronics. Not much difference between a control engineer and a software engineer when you're both writing a PID controller. Broadly, devs are worse at teaching, MUCH better at tooling, and generally less "professional" (for better and worse).

engineers who, generally speaking, are always contributing towards something tangible and arguably beneficial in the world

There's lots of visible, tangible engineering (except for process, systems, supply chain, etc) but quite often it's harmful. Engineers build bombs and fighter jets. They make assembly lines that hurt workers to save money, and apps that are addictive. They make prisons. Some engineers have formal codes of ethics that don't seem to stop them working for Raytheon. Blame the product managers (well, capitalism).

[-] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

non-tech engineering isn't as legit as you think. there are lots of 'real' engineers with that education and job title who don't have a PE

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Me, i'm one of those! Went to Engineering school, worked for 6 months, and decided it wasn't my thing. I could theoretically get a PE if I chose to do it, but I'm OK not working in engineering.

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

FWIW I've heard of people offered Staff SWE right out of grad school. It's not unheard of with a post-bachelor's degree.

[-] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IMO, Facebook internship and boring new grad role at Dropbox is not impressive. the bump to staff engineer (and change to ML) at Affirm is unusual

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Where are you seeing Angel Investor?

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
184 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15916 readers
2 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS