this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24328 readers
187 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This paper discovered the continuous math equivalent of the digital NAND gate. It turns out that a single binary operation paired with the constant 1 can generate every single standard elementary function. That operation is defined as eml(x,y)=exp(x)-ln(y). You can reconstruct constants like pi and the imaginary unit alongside basic addition and complex calculus tools using nothing but this one function.

The implications for machine learning and symbolic regression are massive. Normally when artificial intelligence tries to discover mathematical formulas from data it has to search through a chaotic space of different operators and syntax rules. Because the EML operator turns every mathematical expression into a uniform binary tree of identical nodes the search space becomes perfectly regular. You can basically treat a mathematical formula like a neural network circuit. The paper shows that when you train these EML trees using standard gradient optimizers like Adam the weights can actually snap to exact closed-form symbolic expressions instead of just giving fuzzy numerical approximations.

This finding could change how we design analog circuits and specialized computing hardware. If you only need a single instruction to execute any complex mathematical function you could build physical hardware or single instruction stack machines optimized purely for the EML operation. The fact that this was discovered by computationally stripping down a calculator rather than through purely theoretical derivation highlights how much structural beauty is still hiding in basic math.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Are_Euclidding_Me@hexbear.net 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Wow! This crank is really fixated on how many buttons a scientific calculator has! Poor baby thinks square roots are scary and yet feels as though they're in a position to write a worthwhile paper about math.

Sorry for being a grumpy asshole about this one, it's just extra annoying to read complete bullshit when it's in your chosen field. Likely LLM "assisted" bullshit too, judging by the multiple citations to papers from the 1700s that no one has read in hundreds of years, and that's assuming they're even real papers and not hallucinations the LLM made up that the "author" was too lazy to check.

A bit of a rant:You know what really annoys me about this? It would be a fun toy paper by an amateur interested in math without the LLM stink all over it.

The author of this paper got interested in a legitimately cool little problem: if you keep breaking calculator buttons, how many can you break before you stop being able to do all the calculations you want to do? That's a fun, neat little problem, ripe for a project for an advanced high schooler/early undergraduate!

But instead of playing around with this, having a good time, stretching their math muscles and learning some neat facts/techniques/tricks, they asked an LLM what the answer is, the LLM told them what a smart special person they are for thinking about this problem, and we got this shit-ass paper about this apparent "breakthrough".

Shit sucks, LLM's are a god damn nuisance.

[โ€“] woodenghost@hexbear.net 2 points 1 hour ago

Exactly. It could have been a nice blog entry.