But is it not pathetic that all sorry- most domestic "leftist" political campaigns have to lead with "how imperialism also has negative effects at home"?

Do you have one single example of a revolution that wasn't primarily concerned about what was happening at home? Call it pathetic, but there has never in human history been a revolution just because of what was happening 'over there'.

A significant amount of the posters on that site emphasize that this war only benefits the wealthy, as if it'd somehow be more just should the average U.S citizen enjoy the spoils instead.

Or just an extremely straightforward explanation of the Leninist understanding of imperialism. When he said monopoly capital caused the war for their own gain, was it because he wanted three Russian workers and peasants to get the spoils?

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

I made no lies or serious calls for violence, c'mon. You're more upset that I called out another toothless, dead-end effort by the left adjacent in the U.S.

My other comments were in regards to the electoral efforts in the U.S. These have nothing to do with revolution and will not lead to one.

If you disagree just move on.