Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
A psyop to convince people not to vote for Kamala Harris in 2026?
The logic:
an op to convince people that both parties are the same, so it doesn't matter if you vote. The bad faith argument that voting for harm reduction is the same as voting for harm. It's disingenuous and only serves to break leftist coalition and cause infighting, which only really benefits one side... the right, and it's a textbook tactic of right-wing bullshit.
So yes, a psyop, or duped by a psyop. Eitherway, a dipshit.
To claim Joe Biden was a "harm reduction" candidate, you need to ignore how he extended much of Trump's Term 1 policies and - by refusing to prosecute and imprison any of his first term cabinet - paved the way for even more egregious abuses in his second term.
The Biden Administration did nothing to curb the abuses of the Republican Party. And, in many cases, normalized and entrenched the fascist policies and powers accrued to the executive branch under prior terms of office. When the ink is dry on the history books, he will be remembered as an enabler of Trump's fascist regime in much the same way he was an enabler of the Bush fascist regime from 2001 to 2009.
Harris adviser says VP ran 'flawless' campaign
I have to wonder if you genuinely believe people who say this.
This is an anarchist community, so here's an anarchist perspective. Voting is not and cannot be harm reduction.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/voting-is-not-harm-reduction
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-why-you-shouldn-t-vote#toc1
This entire argument assumes no one does anything other than vote
Which to be fair, is kind of the case for the majority of the population, which is perfectly fine for, and encouraged by, the people of power
Both-sidesism isn't anarchism. It's nihilism. It's the "nothing matters, so there are no rules" surface level "anarchism" take. You can't hide behind hedonistic nihilism by calling it "anarchism". You might as well just come out as the edgelord you want to be and tip your fedora.
When neither side is an anarchist position? It's not two sides. It's one side with two faces.
Wtf are you talking about?
no one is saying "both sides", as though there are only two. we're talking about what harm reduction is, and whether voting qualifies. it does not.
okay, but OP IS saying "both-sides" that's literally what I linked to. That's the whole arguement. Is that OP is a psyop who pushes both-sides bullshit. And ya'll got up your own asses to start quoting theory (that you haven't read) instead of reading the post that was just linked.
badjacketing isn't allowed here.
proving you don't read and huff your own farts.
Badjacketing would be misrepresenting, manufacturing or lying about a person to paint a bad image of them. I literally linked to the thing they just posted, and are doing... nothing about any of that is false or misrepresentative. Just because it makes them look bad and you don't like it, doesn't make it "badjacketing".
Engage with what is being said instead of trying to appeal to some reddit-tier fallacy argument.
Engage with what is being said instead of trying to appeal to some reddit-tier fallacy argument.
calling it a psyop is straight out of cointelpro handbook.
if we're quoting handbooks, then doing a "both sides are bad" is right out the alt-right handbook.
And lets see... a "leftist" in "leftist spaces" making plays from the "alt-right handbook", misrepresenting them as "leftist" opinions to fracture coalition.... what would you call a person like that? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
howabout this, rather than sit here and argue theory and bullshit... lets reframe what you're doing here and see if that's the person you idealize yourself to be.
You're coming to the defense of a powertripping mod that abuses their position to push centrist bullshit and then bans anyone who disagrees with them.
Would you, as an anarchist, come to defend any other self-appointed hierarchical leader that pushes harmful misinformation and silences critics? Hmm? Is this your ideal anarchist community member?