this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
541 points (94.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

2266 readers
1428 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

This entire argument assumes no one does anything other than vote

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

A lot of internet anarchists are like any other internet leftist: their main "actions" are gatekeeping, purity tests, and virtue signaling that they're real [whatever flavor of the left they claim]. They have zero pragmatism and no actionable plans -- but they get pissed if anyone suggests something that doesn't perfectly align with their professed ideals.

They don't actually do anything for their cause in the real world: all they do is bitch on the internet and to their close circle of interchangeable friends. They're the dead wood of progressiveness.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Which to be fair, is kind of the case for the majority of the population, which is perfectly fine for, and encouraged by, the people of power

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Which to be fair, is kind of the case for a majority of the population

It's clearly not. I don't sit in a box until election day. I've got a household to tend to, friends to support, family to care for, and an economy to participate in. All of these actions have political implications and consequences.

People need to recognize that caring for an ailing parent, holding down a job at a convenience store, opening up your house to a roommate (or renting that unit for a profit), driving a car versus riding a bike, calling the cops, littering - these all carry political weight. How you spend the majority of your waking hours is still a consequence of your ideology even in constrained circumstances.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm glad you don't, what I mean is that for a lot of people, participating in a democracy rarely goes beyond voting every cycle, even if they do other actions that can be considered participation to democracy