this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
569 points (94.8% liked)

Flippanarchy

2266 readers
1337 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules

  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
569
americans are selfish (quokk.au)
submitted 17 hours ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This is an anarchist community, so here's an anarchist perspective. Voting is not and cannot be harm reduction.

The idea of a ballot being capable of reducing the harm in a system rooted in colonial domination and exploitation, white supremacy, hetero-patriarchy, and capitalism is an extraordinary exaggeration. There is no person whose lives aren’t impacted everyday by these systems of oppression, but instead of coded reformism and coercive “get out the vote” campaigns towards a “safer” form of settler colonialism, we’re asking “what is the real and tragic harm and danger associated with perpetuating colonial power and what can be done to end it?”

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/voting-is-not-harm-reduction

Harm reduction is harmful

Voting as harm reduction does more harm than good. Accepting reforms through voting makes people settle for a partial goal; it is a concession. From this position of compromise, the state entrenches its position, and it becomes more difficult to push further, for voters fear losing their partial gains. Accepting harm reduction also divides the movement, because some will be satisfied with the crumbs, while others want it all (see the split at the ZAD). Harm reduction also assumes that the harm (the government) cannot be removed entirely, which is an argument that there can be no anarchy.

Voting is not harm reduction

For the vast majority of issues, there’s no difference between the political parties. They are all the parties of business, climate destruction, deportation, incarceration, police, surveillance, drone strikes, sacred site desecration, et cetera. By getting you to believe that there is a lesser of two evils, the state dampens your desire for abolishing it, because you are meant to believe that things will be worse if you don’t vote and support a political party. Look at the fact that the George Floyd Rebellion occurred under Trump, where liberals, and progressives, and leftists didn’t get what they want, where the harm was supposedly greater, than under Biden, where those same people lie dormant, accepting the lesser evil world as a blessed reprieve.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-why-you-shouldn-t-vote#toc1

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This entire argument assumes no one does anything other than vote

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

A lot of internet anarchists are like any other internet leftist: their main "actions" are gatekeeping, purity tests, and virtue signaling that they're real [whatever flavor of the left they claim]. They have zero pragmatism and no actionable plans -- but they get pissed if anyone suggests something that doesn't perfectly align with their professed ideals.

They don't actually do anything for their cause in the real world: all they do is bitch on the internet and to their close circle of interchangeable friends. They're the dead wood of progressiveness.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Which to be fair, is kind of the case for the majority of the population, which is perfectly fine for, and encouraged by, the people of power

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Which to be fair, is kind of the case for a majority of the population

It's clearly not. I don't sit in a box until election day. I've got a household to tend to, friends to support, family to care for, and an economy to participate in. All of these actions have political implications and consequences.

People need to recognize that caring for an ailing parent, holding down a job at a convenience store, opening up your house to a roommate (or renting that unit for a profit), driving a car versus riding a bike, calling the cops, littering - these all carry political weight. How you spend the majority of your waking hours is still a consequence of your ideology even in constrained circumstances.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm glad you don't, what I mean is that for a lot of people, participating in a democracy rarely goes beyond voting every cycle, even if they do other actions that can be considered participation to democracy

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

here’s an anarchist perspective

Both-sidesism isn't anarchism. It's nihilism. It's the "nothing matters, so there are no rules" surface level "anarchism" take. You can't hide behind hedonistic nihilism by calling it "anarchism". You might as well just come out as the edgelord you want to be and tip your fedora.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Both-sidesism isn’t anarchism.

When neither side is an anarchist position? It's not two sides. It's one side with two faces.

hedonistic nihilism

Wtf are you talking about?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

no one is saying "both sides", as though there are only two. we're talking about what harm reduction is, and whether voting qualifies. it does not.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Anarcho-nihilism is a thing. Personally I find it a little bleak, I think we should have a vision to move towards.
  2. So we can criticize voting itself, but not the parties that perpetuate it?
[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

howabout this, rather than sit here and argue theory and bullshit... lets reframe what you're doing here and see if that's the person you idealize yourself to be.

You're coming to the defense of a powertripping mod that abuses their position to push centrist bullshit and then bans anyone who disagrees with them.
Would you, as an anarchist, come to defend any other self-appointed hierarchical leader that pushes harmful misinformation and silences critics? Hmm? Is this your ideal anarchist community member?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago
  1. I don't think the mod is power tripping. They used the piefed default ban length (2100-2026=74), and the mod is allowed to moderate their community as they see fit. They don't allow aggressive neoliberal talking points. That's their choice.
  2. I'm a fan of the community, so I'm familiar with the mod's behavior. They aren't centrist, they were criticizing the democratic party. I don't necessarily agree with the post, but that doesn't make it misinformation.
  3. As a mod of a few communities myself, we're custodians of a community, not "hierarchical leaders".
  4. The principle of free association means that I can freely interact with them as long as both parties see it as mutually beneficial. If I didn't like the mod, what they post, or their community, then I block them. If they don't like me, what I post, or my communities, then they block me.