this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
75 points (94.1% liked)

askchapo

23253 readers
173 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see this moon launch as an exorbitantly wasteful, nationalist project. No money for healthcare and housing, but plenty of money to boldly go where man has gone several many times before.

When I bring this up with liberal friends and family, they give me a sort of incredulous look and talk about how wonderful and scientific and non-political it is. I don't mind being the "you've gone too far left" guy, but you talk to the same people about military spending and they're right on board.

Is someone here able to diagnose my crankiness and explain why this is actually a good use of resources? (Will also accept echo-chamber validation and ways to use this to increase class consciousness, if offered.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Communism is a stateless, classless, moneyless society, but what tells you it will be "humbugless"? I know that research is far cheaper, safer and easier with specialized robots than with people, I just don't see why that matters. My idea is that people will land on the moon under communism because (1) it is possible, and (2) it is really really cool.

Edit: To be clear about my biases here: I was born roughly midway between Apollo 17 and Artemis II, and the first time I ever said what I wanted to be when I grew up, my answer was that I wanted to be the first person to set foot on Pluto. So if you're old enough to remember the '60s and '70s, then sure, I can understand finding Artemis II to be a complete wet fart compared to the Apollo program. You were there, you'd know. What I find less understandable is the certain majority of Hexbears who grew up in the '80s~'10s who have never in their lifetimes seen a human being go beyond LEO… I mean, yeah, sure, it's Been Done Before, but you haven't been there to see it happen, right?

So when I saw the Artemis II launch live, I was genuinely moved to tears. I felt connected to everybody else who saw the launch live with me, and to the past generations who saw the Apollo launches live. A launch like Artemis II is literally something I've been waiting two lifetimes to get to see happen, so when people go around making fun of it I get a bit irate. Like, there are many, many critiques of the program that are completely fair and that I don't mind reading or hearing, but when people come across as actually accusing anyone genuinely emotionally moved by the mission of being stupid… Y'know? I just don't like it. I don't like feeling like people are calling me stupid for liking things.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am in favor of going to space cause it's cool. I'm more of a build a fuckload of orbital space stations kinda guy tho. The moon is cool but dammit I wanna leave on an orbital colony and die fighting for Zeon

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not cool. We don't need to go up.

We need to go down. Defund all space programs. We need digging platforms.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

How about we compromise and go sideways

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Fun fact: theres more unexplored space inside the earth than in the whole galaxy