news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
view the rest of the comments
So they have about ~700-800 left for Iran, ~425 in storage.
Sure, a thousand of these missiles didn't degrade Iran's ability to control Hormuz nor collapse the state, but just maybe another 800 will!
"but it might work for us"
https://youtu.be/Po4adxJxqZk
Top comment on that is "regime change wars in the middle East" and I think maybe that is a hexbear user
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
The us is woefully under prepared to fight a war against China if they are still having using long range stealth cruise missiles against an enemy that is primarily operating IR based AA systems. How do they expect to fight a war against an enemy with a robust integrated air defense system when they barley have any long range stealthy cruise missiles left?
That's why they want a 1.5 trillion defense budget.
The limiting factor now isn't money, it's a comically pathetic manufacturing capability. Every additional dollar at this point will just go to graft. They aren't actually going to get equipment any faster
They may not be able to get most of this stuff back at all
With nukes
Against Iran I could believe but against China it's MAD and I think that still holds weight with these people due to basic individual self-preservation.
It's not something I've thought about before but China hasn't shown that they've got that MAD dog in them. Russia has, Iran has, DPRK has, but there's a case to be made that China won't actually do it.
I think that is a completely incorrect reading but I wonder if it is something that China is currently considering. The perception that you are too dangerous to fuck with goes a long way and it probably makes sense for China to put that question to rest within the next 5-10 years, particularly with how committed the US is to becoming increasingly unhinged.
Nah, China definitely has that MAD dog in them. China is all peace and harmony until you violate their borders, then they go pure psycho mode. People try to extrapolate the PRC's passivity towards allies and think that this passivity would still be at play when the actual country's at threat.
And even that relies on a slowly-dwindling manufacturing and technological capacity. How do they expect to win a nuclear conflict against China if their most capable ICBM interceptor has 44 units and a 40% interception rate? What about hypersonic glide vehicles that it still hasn't produced beyond a few test in units?
Russia and China aren't exactly proven in their interceptors tbf but they have much more first hand experience with ballistic missiles and glide vehicles, which translates to a higher capacity for improvement over an enemy that uses neither. Russia already punches well above its class in modern air defenses considering their relative R&D capacity (which had dried up considerably well before the USSR collapsed).
Russia, China, DPRK etc. chose to prioritize their missile programs (and thus nuclear deterrents and air defenses by coincidence) in the unipolar age, and the US empire conversely leaned into cruise missiles and guided precision weapons for "low intensity" asymmetric conflicts. Dialectically, the US was doomed once it rebuilt its military for the end of history.
Full source
This is a contingency move for months long operations, as the rate of JASSM use has likely declined.
The US is going to run out of JASSMs long before Iran runs out of missiles or drones. Shouldn't have wasted such precious ammunition on schools and hospitals I guess. Would have gotten more mileage out of military target