this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
58 points (96.8% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14326 readers
453 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] darkcalling@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Google and most companies policies in case of child sexual abuse is to nuke everything from orbit. Anything related is not worth the risk from their perspective that abuse or sharing of abusive imagery continues. They do NOT want to be hauled into court to explain why they banned a pedo's main account but didn't ban their alt account which they continued to use to abuse kids.

It is out of an abundance of caution.

Even if every single one of them was a paying Google subscriber to the tune of $20/mo it wouldn't likely be worth the risks in terms of cost/benefit analysis from Google's point of view.

[โ€“] JustSo@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago

It is out of an abundance of caution.

Yeah and now the parents can't go back and see whether the fucking LLM might have encouraged the kid. It's a win for everyone.