Oh really? If he’s such a strong anti-imperialist how is he a piece of shit? Maybe explain that instead of just hand waving literally every concern your comrades reply with and calling them libs.

Some of you read the front cover of ‘Imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism’ and decided that there’s no material basis for the idea?

No, seriously, let’s have a struggle sesh about this, defend the fash in front of the entire community. If his faux anti-imperialism is good enough for you to throw others under the bus, explain why the rest of us deserve to die

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

i think tucker is more likely to advocate regime change in entity than aocia, which tells you something non?

He is not strong anything, just amerikkkan leftists with a voice are complete dogshit in their radicalness.

jon stewart is interviewing jack murder them all sullivan as a comparable figure on the centrist side.

$rtx bernie has founded a new country named netanyahu in the middle east.

obamdani is too busy building pretty jails to have opinions, apparently.

tucker is outflanking them in rhetoric, if by an inch. not that he is better than the-podcast

of course he soft sells empire, he is a company man. he is a chud chotiner, he lands interviews with economist editors or whoever the fuck, it's different sphere of media than leftism as such.

i would like a leftist with profile to eviscerate matt duss, but alas we have hasan vote-them-all-in. i also would like a leftist with a voice to do a read out of "partisan tactics in ww2: historic perspective" with a straight face, but no one will touch anything demonitazeable by the "platforms"