this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
297 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

19588 readers
2279 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how that works. The Sahara savannah is tied to the rotation of the earth on its axis. That takes roughly 23,000 years. The period of time between savannah periods is about 13,000 years and the last one ended roughly 6,000-7,000 years ago. The next one will start in roughly 6,0000-7,000 more years.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This is oversimplified, by a lot. There are many factors impacting Africa's aridity, including the current glaciation cycle, sea levels as a result thereof, the AMOC, etc.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

... Are you aware of any study or perhaps graphic or map based on a studies that... actually tries to model the effects of an AMOC shutdown?

Because I loosely keep up with Paul Beckwith's roughly weekly videos and uh... the SMOC ain't doin so great, and like, currently, and in the last month or two... well, the artctic polar vortex has ... more or been destabilizing... to a rather extreme amount...

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world -4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

True, but I'm not trying to write a dissertation while enjoying my morning bowl o weed

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well you were certainly happy to discredit it. If you aren't willing to explain why, dont speak

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

Just like you explained the full thing? That type of "not speaking?"

I simplified things. You added no concrete additional context.