this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
124 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14299 readers
574 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

they let them drown

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fox@hexbear.net 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey someone remind me why states take prisoners instead of fighting to the last again

[–] Firstnamebunchofnumbers@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] fox@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm doing a bit but it's because if you want your own captured soldiers to not be killed or mistreated, you have to not kill or mistreat the captives you take. They're also useful leverage in negotiation: "we'll return 500 PoWs if you'll honor such and such ceasefire" sort of thing.

Also, if you take prisoners your enemy may be more willing to surrender if their position is lost. If they know they're all going to die no matter what, they're going to make sure to hurt you as badly as they can before they go.

Taking no prisoners makes you worse at warfare.

@Grok is this true