this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
236 points (91.3% liked)

Science Memes

19403 readers
1335 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How do we know it wasn't the other way around?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a paper came out recently. it's also possible that male humans and female neanderthals made non viable babies.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is a few different potential reasons as well as sexual preference.

Genetic incompatibility - the interspecific cross could only occur one way.

Genetic bottlenecks in the neandertal lineage. A high inbred coefficient could have decreased the neandertal females overall fertility (high deleterious alleles load). This could also cause a rapid reduction in the percentage of neandertal DNA in a mixed population.

Maternal behavior - Neandertals females might not have cared for hybrid offspring appropriately. This could be for anything from milk production requirements to differences in physiological developmental rates.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Genetic incompatibility - the interspecific cross could only occur one way.

This could be human male-neanderthal female (HMNF) coupling didn't result in fertile offspring right? Could it also be that HMNF (coupling) didn't result in fertile female offspring, but did have fertile male offspring?

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Usually these issues are caused by mitochondrial DNA not nuclear DNA. Mitochondrial DNA is only passed on from the female. So if there is an incompatibility, it's usually completely lethal to any offspring.

So a HMNF coupling could not have been possible because of the neanderthal's female mitochondrial DNA.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the idea of there being health issues in certain types of mixed families is super interesting because that almost certainly would have been noticed and lead to certain cultural practices or taboos within both species' societies.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I had to guess the successful crosses were potentially much healthier than either parent line. Heterosis (hybrid vigor) would likely be pretty extreme in genetic lines that has been isolated by 300,000+ years of time. Of course the degree of fertility was likely lowered due to genetic distance. Once the initial cross was made however, back-crossing to either species by the hybrid would likely be much easier.

Many of those ancient stories about individuals with super strength and size etc could have likely been based upon these crosses.

The evidence is showing neadertals never truly died out. Their smaller population bred back into the modern humans who came later.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Keep in mind heterosis isn't always the result of hybridization and even then the magnitude of isolation doesn't always positively correlate. Outbreeding depression can also be the result, increasingly so when two groups are more genetically distant or when one group is already subject to heavy inbreeding depression, as the neanderthals were thought to be.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Out-breeding depression primarily results in a decrease of fertility and infant mortality. So although it is occasionally observed in surviving offspring, in general it is much lower probability.

Also the neandertal crossing was deleterious it would be much lower percentage in modern humans. It also would not have come from multiple crossing events.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

This is a fantastic thread, I love this meme sub