this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
193 points (99.0% liked)

World News

54247 readers
2613 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Vegans had a 40% higher risk of bowel cancer when compared with meat eaters.

Regarding vegetarians and cancer yes, but most studies show that a moderate intake of meat is beneficial to your OVERALL health. And this study does NOT show that less meat the better.
Also a lot of studies including this one, show that some nutrients are hard to obtain as a vegan, so you need supplements to stay healthy.

I don't think you read the article, but just had a knee jerk reaction to the headline.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not the person you responded to. But I feel personally attacked by your last sentence. How dare you. That is the way of the internet comment section. What kind of world would we live in if people actually read the article?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yes I am aware that this is a cultural thing among many people. And responses by people that read the article can seem confusing.
Admittedly I do it myself sometimes, but in this case that regards peoples health, I think a clarification was in place. 😋

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting how they call out vitamin B and calcium. Ovo/lactose vegetarians have just as much dairy as meat eaters and probably eat even more calcium-rich foods like kale and other greens. Most dairy substitutes are calcium fortified as well.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes the calcium part is outright weird? Regarding B vitamin I think it's some specific B vitamins like B12, definitely not all of them.
I think there may have been some journalistic misunderstanding, because it is mentioned in context with Vegans, while the article also seems to lump the 2 together at times. Which is a problem IMO, because there's a huge difference between Vegetarian that drink milk and eat fish and eggs, and a Vegan that eat zero animal products.

[–] Soulcreator@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree with everything you said, except for one point. Vegetarians by definition do not eat fish, pescatarian is likely the word you are looking for as they eat everything you listed with the inclusion of fish.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah ok I thought fish was included, because I've known some who call themselves vegetarians who eat fish.

[–] Soulcreator@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a common misunderstanding, not exactly sure where it stems from. When I was a vegetarian many years ago it wouldn't be uncommon for people to offer me fish.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Maybe it comes from the distinction between meat and fish that stems from fasting in Catholicism.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Vegetarians don't drink milk or eat fish and eggs

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You’re correct that vegetarians don’t eat fish. People who eat fish but no other meats are called “pescatarians”, as someone mentioned earlier.

However, “vegetarian” refers to people with diets of mostly plants and sometimes animal byproducts that don’t require killing the animal (like milk and eggs).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism

The specific subset of vegetarians who don’t eat or use any animal byproducts are called “vegans”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veganism

It can be confusing because there’s sort of a tree of consumption/diets and there are a lot of terms, and some of the terms sound similar. Hope this helps.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do we know what moderate means?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here it means less than 150g per day. But there is no minimum recommendation AFAIK, probably because most people eat too much.
So optimal amount is a bit murky. It probably also varies depending of what types of meat you eat. It is generally understood that chicken is better for your health than red meat.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

150gr is moderate ?! Daaaaamn. TIL our family is moderate as fuck then. More than 150 is just not feeling okay. We are pushing to 200 when it’s steak day. I’m curious what’s the average now.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_meat_consumption

I live in Denmark, and we were highest on meat consumption in 2002, but in 2020 the amount of meat consumed per person was cut by more than half!
So the highest number was in 2002 with 146 kg per year per person, or 397 gr per day, more than double the recommendation on average!
Supermarkets here are making smaller packages, and beef is now taxed to reduce consumption of that in particular. Also because it is considered more environmentally harmful than other types of meat.