this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
72 points (97.4% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14283 readers
641 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently marijuana was in the files. They were speaking how people who smoke marijuana are harder to manipulate because it makes us open our mind and question things more, whereas alcohol does the opposite effect. Which is why alcohol is promoted while marijuana is demonized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Marijuana is banned because Mexican immigrants grew it to make money. Cocaine is banned because black dockworkers used it to stay awake. Nothing is banned if you're white and willing to pay for it.

[–] Castor_Troy@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That could be a factor, but there are politicians from back in the day recorded saying they stigmatized weed to counteract the politics of blacks, hippies, etc.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

John Ehrlichman.

“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

[–] Castor_Troy@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but there are politicians from back in the day recorded saying they stigmatized weed to counteract the politics of blacks, hippies, etc.

it still never ceases to amaze me that president nixon admitted to doing this and people still believe that the drugs are bad.

[–] Castor_Troy@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought it was Nixon but wasn't sure. I'd speculate with near certainty that most people just do not know that recording exists.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

that has to be the only explanation that makes sense to me; but the scale of this kind of ignorance becomes staggering when you consider the sheer volume of information that the american gov't released thanks to things like the freedom of information act.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah the war on drugs was a war on the left

[–] Castor_Troy@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

Well said. I forgot that point that it was even more concrete than how I stated it. The strategy was to weaken the left. The tactic was to do that by stigmatizing communities associated with the left because of their association with weed.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

and opium was banned to give the police a reason to prosecute chinese migrants while laudanum was left alone because it was the opium that white people used.

i think it's fascination how much you can learn of a person's world view by how they regard these drugs.