this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
122 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24364 readers
355 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's very telling that they just implemented the AI without even giving its answers any sanity checks near the beginning. Could have caught it day one but no, it's magic and checking would be a waste of time
I mean, it could've worked well at the beginning, then fallen off the rails for some reason or another.
That's the dumb and scary thing about AI stuff: it might work today, it might work for years (if you're lucky), but every time you execute a prompt, you're rolling the dice on whether the mystery box will decide to just make up some shit from here on out. If you need a person to check the AI's output to make sure it's not hallucinating, might as well cut the Ai off from the loop altogether.