this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
173 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
42236 readers
385 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
IIRC Dessalines (Lemmy and Jerboa frontend dev) once said to regret adding infinite scrolling, and the only reason he didn't remove the feature is because people would rage. So odds are Jerboa will be one of the first to comply.
And... frankly? As much as I criticise Lemmy devs, I think Dessalines is right in this one.
Voyager (like Apollo before it) has the option to disable infinite scrolling, I won’t use a client without it
I am so braindead I can't even imagine how it would work without endless scrolling?
X amount of posts before it stops scrolling. Then you'd have a classic "next page" button like we used to.
Basically you add a conscious choice to keep going, and creating a much more natural stopping point.
Pagination
You reach the bottom of the feed and have to click something to load another page or reload the forum
But why? I don't mind infinite scrolling here. And an option to opt in/out and everybody's happy I suppose.
I see how it can create problems for some, but OTOH I also don't want some bureocrats tell me what's good for me. I bet those are the same bunch that brought us infinite cookie warnings clicking.
Nah, cookie banners are a malicious compliance tactic adopted by the advertising industry after they got told they can't surveil the whole of the internet without consent.
The bureaucrats are actually hard at work to get rid of cookie banners in the very near future, making it obligatory to follow an in browser setting. You click decline once on install, and that's it is the plan.
These same policy wonks tell you to wear a seat belt because that's (proven) good for you; as is not smoking. They tell everyone ELSE not to speed because those wonks know everyone else is a terrible driver, and that's better for you. These are the types who maintain building code and human rights and legal process because - yep - it's better for you.
There's a trend, here. I get that we sometimes feel opposition to things, but when there is science behind it - sit DOWN, RFKjr and the rest of you whackadoos - it's usually good to go with it.
Because it's a piece of addictive design. Here in Lemmy it's fairly isolated, so not a big deal; but in larger and corporate platforms, it's coupled with even more addictive design, in a way that you're basically "stuck".