this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
66 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14272 readers
511 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Nashville Sit-Ins were among the earliest non-violent direct action campaigns that targeted Southern racial segregation in the 1960s. The sit-ins, which lasted from February 13 to May 10, 1960, sought to desegregate downtown lunch counters in Nashville, Tennessee. The protests were coordinated by the Nashville Student Movement and the Nashville Christian Leadership Council (NCLC), primarily consisting of students from Fisk University, Baptist Theological Seminary, and Tennessee State University. Diane Nash and John Lewis, who were both students at Fisk University, emerged as the major leaders of the local movement.

On February 13, 1960, twelve days after the Greensboro, North Carolina sit-ins began, Nashville college students entered Kress (now K-Mart), Woolworth’s, and McClellan stores at 12:40 p.m. After making their purchases, the students sat down at the lunch counters. Store owners initially refused to serve the students and closed the counters, claiming it was their “moral right” to determine whom they would or would not serve. The students continued the sit-ins over the next three months, expanding their targets to include lunch counters at the Greyhound and Trailways bus terminals, Grant’s Variety Store, Walgreens Drugstore, and major Nashville department stores, Cain-Sloan and Harvey.

The first violent response to the protests came on February 27, which James Lawson, Jr., another protest leader called “big Saturday.” The protesters that day were attacked by a white group opposing desegregation. The police arrested eighty-one protesters but none of the attackers. Those arrested were found guilty of disorderly conduct. They all decided to serve time in jail rather than pay fines.

As racial tension grew in Nashville, Mayor Ben West appointed a biracial committee to investigate segregation in the city. Despite the committee’s numerous attempts at a compromise, the students declared that they would accept nothing less than the acknowledgement of their rights to sit at the store lunch counters along with white customers. On April 5, the committee suggested that the counters be divided into black and white sections. The NCLC and the Nashville Student Movement rejected the proposal, arguing that segregation of the counters was no better than black exclusion from them.

On April 19, a bomb destroyed the home of Z. Alexander Looby, the defense attorney representing many of the protesters. The bombing of Lobby’s home triggered a mass march to city hall where 2,500 protesters demanded answers from Mayor West. Diane Nash pointedly asked Mayor West if it was wrong for a citizen of Nashville to discriminate against his fellow citizens because of his race or skin color. The mayor admitted that it was wrong, giving the students an important symbolic victory in their campaign. Nash then asked the mayor if the lunch counters in Nashville should be desegregated. They mayor said they should.

After weeks of secret negotiations between merchants and protest leaders, an agreement was finally reached during the first week of May. On May 10, six downtown stores opened their lunch counters to black customers for the first time; the customers arrived in groups of two or three during the afternoon and were served without incident. With that agreement, Nashville became the first major southern city to begin desegregating public facilities. The Nashville campaign became a model for other civil rights protests in the 1960s and 1970s.

hello everyone - happy Black history month 🌌 here's a massive archive list of Black and Marxist writing and film (with downloads!) to check out xoxo

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

Financial Support to the Bearsite

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Saw someone I met at a party and got along with on a dating app. Felt like I was Uncle Aaron grabbing Miles Morales by the throat. I lost the will to judge their profile or anyone else's for that matter

[–] PowerLurker@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tangentially related, lo siento, but your post reminded me that just today i was thinking if my current relationship doesn't work out idk if i could ever stomach going back on dating apps. i came in well after the golden age of them and they were enshittified garbage when i started and somehow got even worse over the couple years on and off i used them. idk, the memory/thought of them makes my stomach sink, what a dystopian way to connect.

think i'd just hope the grillpill (having irl friends and community and a social life) would allow me to stumble into something by chance, and if not c'est la vie. 

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm doing it as entertainment slop. I didn't update my profile and I'm swiping no on 99.9%. One person didn't even want anything short or long term and we're tangentially friends now. I'm a flight risk, I'm emotionally not ready to give someone all that attention, and don't know if I will be.

I've come to understand the appeal of polyamory where someone else can take my partner while I go bing bing wahoo!

Basically the new world struggles to be born so on and so forth sniff

[–] PowerLurker@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

that’s real, i know many who do same. the dopamine hit of a match could be a guilty pleasure ngl ngl. (but like many such things was ultimately bad for my health)