this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
571 points (99.1% liked)

memes

19856 readers
1970 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (5 children)

To be fair to Connery, Zardoz was right after 007. He was type casted and nobody would hire him. He had to do something different to get new work. Also, Zardoz is legit a good movie... If you get past the weird and laughable aesthetic choices, the plot is a decent sci fi plot.

[–] TwodogsFighting 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And then Highlander, so it was no wonder he was a bit wary when it came to LOTR.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My shubmarine doeshn’t react well to bulletsh, Ryan.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You've really gotta admire his outright contempt at the thought of even attempting a Russian accent in that movie.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

His character is actually Lithuanian, so he shouldn't have a Russian accent. Not that Scottish is accurate...

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

It was a thriller movie in the 90s for American audiences.

Whether he had contempt or not the accents did not matter. Just needed something to indicate "not American"

It’s honestly hilarious and one of the reasons I love that movie

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Some things in here don’t react well to bullets”

Sorry, I munged the quote a bit from memory 😅

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

But Highlander was awesome.

It won the Academy Award for best movie ever made.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

Also, Zardoz is legit a good movie

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Zardoz is legit a good movie

I assumed it was going to be, but when I watched I found it aggressively terrible.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But, did you watch it a second time? Honestly it's awful the first watch because you can't get past the aesthetic of it. When I watched it again I realized the movie itself is pretty good. It's practically the definition of a good bad movie.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have not. Maybe I'll try it again someday because I actually have more than once hated a movie first try and liked it on second viewing.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I don't blame you. I took a long time between viewings. I liked it enough that I had my goalie mask painted like the big stone head. I figured it was funny and a stone head was appropriate for a goalie.

Also, Zardoz is where he came up with the policy of not acting in movies that he doesn't "get".

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Zardoz is legit a good movie

Well, ok. But we are comparing it with the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

(But then, committing to a trilogy probably has a huge opportunity cost.)

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Bear in mind that very few people thought a film adaptation of LOTR was actually going to be any good. It seems obvious now, but it was not seen a really viable project with how trilogies were made at the time (with many years between them) the amount of budget needed, and the effects challenges. The guys who made the movies deserve a lot of credit for doing something so well that it looks obvious when they are done, but little thinks like how to do the hobbits were seen as effects challenges with no real solution that wouldn't look stupid or be insanely expensive.

Connery would have been the biggest name in the film and getting attached to something that wound up looking like shit or making him look stupid would have been a bigger problem for him than anyone. Again, its obvious that they turned out great, but look at what Peter Jackson made before this and its not really as obvious a choice as one would think now (although I am personally a fan of his early work, I get why people might not be and why people maybe wouldn't hand him the biggest film franchise in history).

And just for a fun tidbit, at the time that Connery bailed on the offer the film was being produced by Weinstein, so I get maybe not wanting to work with that dirtbag. They almost lost Liv Tyler for the same reason and reportedly did lose them Ashley Judd and Mia Sorvino, who flat out refused to be attached to anything involving him.