this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
263 points (92.8% liked)

Science Memes

18851 readers
1261 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I also looked three of them up on the NASA Technical Report Server and got other results.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Did you really get other results, or did you get papers that were still accurately described by the editorialized titles? On the one I looked up, the author and publication date were the same, and it really was about "the repeated survival of systems never intended to work [under the more extreme than designed conditions they were subjected to]" even if the actual title wasn't that spicy.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago

Oh shit, i didn't consider that... I'll look again later tonight. I wanted to check out the wobbly one. lol