this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
158 points (96.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36881 readers
1808 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems kind of primitive to have power lines just hanging on poles, right?

Bit unsightly too

Is it just a cost issue and is it actually significant when considering the cost of power loss on society (work, hospital, food, etc)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There’s a pragmatic reason too. Power lines and transformers need constant maintenance. When the line fails somewhere, it’s easier to access when you don’t have to dig, and also less disruptive.

Also, they’re up high because people in general are dumb af and will fuck with them if they’re within reach.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Power lines need way less maintenance if you bury them.

Orders of magnitude less maintenance.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago

its likely becauses it protected from damage by the ground/concrete, and wear and tear from weather.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

The cost to reach them to diagnose and replace outweighs the decreased maintenance. Digging is really expensive.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was in a suburb once that had the lines running in an accessible plastic rectangle running between the sidewalk and road and it seemed pretty brilliant

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Which is a solution for a limited area where the extra cost and longer install time might be deemed worthwhile, but when you want to run miles upon miles of lines then it is less feasible.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it’s probably reasonable to run the large transmission lines open because they’re huge and easier to landscape but most people live in dense suburbs or cities (where they’re already underground)

And most dense suburbs just have their power polls waiting precariously under trees which requires additional tree maintenance and is expensive to fix after a storm

I agree there are places it wouldn’t make sense but it seems like nearly all the places where it would make sense still havnt bothered (cost, I know)

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

Companies have done the math, repeatedly.

If underground cost less even over a 5 year period, they would be doing it.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In a dense urban environment you are wanting retrofitted lines run through terrain already full of concrete, water lines, and other urban features. That would take a lot of coordination in design and still likely miss things (which means more time and money on redesigns). It also means a long installation time which means extended disruption to the area.

These sorts of underground lines are easier to run in totally fresh new construction, but then again, it runs into servicing issues and extra expense.

is expensive to fix after a storm

Assessing and fixing underground lines is much harder, more expensive, and disruptive.