this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
510 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27307 readers
2544 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the midst of whining about how much he wanted to own Greenland, Donald Trump forgot what the territory was called.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Denmark is so cucked and by association so is the EU. They literally gave the US sovereignty over parts of Greenland after this. It won't stop here. You give an inch and he'll take a mile. This is not how you deal with a bully.

If I was in the EU I'd be freaking out RN.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

They literally gave the US sovereignty over parts of Greenland after this.

Nothing has happened and that entire article is wild speculation.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They gave the US sovereignty of parts of Greenland? I tried searching for news on this but couldn't find anything. What are you referring to?

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not an agreed upon deal yet, but it is coming and it will involve sovereignty. Source

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 12 points 1 day ago

"Sovereignty over military bases."

They already had that on Greenland since 1951. As recent as last summer Denmark even approved the same setup in mainland Denmark, so that the potential future American military bases in Denmark could be allowed to operate their bases under American laws instead of local laws, just like an embassy.

Needless to say, this is wildly unpopular at the moment.

A Guantánamo Bay style deal is not that crazy.

[–] bluemite@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Where the sun don't shine.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

"Small pockets" are all the USA needs to land troops. They're making a full-scale invasion easier by appeasing him.