this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
73 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14325 readers
602 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is NATO even really an “alliance” in the true sense though? Or just a formalisation of american imperial hierarchy
Debatable, they've never used their military power for collective defence of a member(libs will debate this as article 5 was invoked to 'protect' America by the NATO invasion of Afghanistan, but imo that doesn't count as a defence since it wasn't fighting on American soil and was essentially a 'pre-emptive strike' to prevent further Al-Qaeda attacks(accepting the official 9/11 story, and ignoring the Taliban's over to hand bin-laden over to a neutral country for evidence-based prosecution, and taking the US's casus belli as legitimate) despite the Al-Qaeda cell allegedly responsible operating out of Germany and having no Afghan members ), only for aggressive military acts that support the US's geopolitical ambitions
'An alliance led by the US to enforce its empire' maybe accurate, but I guess 'organisation' or something similar better describes the unequal nature of member states as 'alliance' suggests members are equalish peers