this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
73 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14325 readers
602 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

His speech is over.

10m ago • Trump says he wants to build ‘greatest Golden Dome ever built’ over Greenland

25m ago • Trump: We will remember if you say no over Greenland

28m ago • Trump: not sure Nato would be there for us

36m ago • Trump: I won't use force to take Greenland

42m ago • Trump: Seeking immediate negotiations for purchase of Greenland

44m ago • Trump: US ‘takes great care’ about the people of Europe, but they are ‘destroying themselves’

45m ago • Trump: You'd be speaking German and Japanese without us

53m ago • Europe 'not heading in right direction', Trump says

1h ago • Trump: Inflation has been defeated

1h ago • Trump's speech is under way

https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2026/jan/21/davos-trump-speech-wef-greenland-bessent-trade-milei-globalisation-business-live-updates

---

Edit

On Minnesota, Trump criticises the “mass import” of foreign cultures, citing Somalia. He then hits out at “fake congressperson” Ilhan Omar, criticising her for “telling us how to run America”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

an alliance cannot be this one sided long term

Is NATO even really an “alliance” in the true sense though? Or just a formalisation of american imperial hierarchy

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Is NATO even really an “alliance"

Debatable, they've never used their military power for collective defence of a member(libs will debate this as article 5 was invoked to 'protect' America by the NATO invasion of Afghanistan, but imo that doesn't count as a defence since it wasn't fighting on American soil and was essentially a 'pre-emptive strike' to prevent further Al-Qaeda attacks(accepting the official 9/11 story, and ignoring the Taliban's over to hand bin-laden over to a neutral country for evidence-based prosecution, and taking the US's casus belli as legitimate) despite the Al-Qaeda cell allegedly responsible operating out of Germany and having no Afghan members ), only for aggressive military acts that support the US's geopolitical ambitions

'An alliance led by the US to enforce its empire' maybe accurate, but I guess 'organisation' or something similar better describes the unequal nature of member states as 'alliance' suggests members are equalish peers