181
submitted 1 year ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

A Texas prisoner accused of killing 22 older women over two years, preying on them so he could steal jewelry and other valuables, was slain Tuesday by his cellmate while serving a life sentence, prison officials said.

Billy Chemirmir, 50, who was convicted last year in the slayings of two women, was found dead in his cell at a prison in rural East Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesperson Hannah Haney said. He was killed by his cellmate who was also serving a prison sentence for murder, according to Haney.

Chemirmir’s death comes about two weeks after Texas’ 100 prisons were placed on a rare statewide lockdown because of a rise in the number of killings inside the facilities, which prisons officials have said were related to drugs.

Haney did not release the name of the cellmate, how Chemirmir was killed or what may have led to the slaying.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

So prisons can't maintain the one thing they are there for: security.

Oh ya? Says who? And security for who?

If you think prisons are here to keep prisoners safe you are 100% misinformed.

In America prisons are for-profit. Their only job is to make sure you stay there and don’t return to the public. Whether you stay safe or not isn’t a concern to them. They don’t give a fuck about your well being.

In America prisons are designed to be cruel, not to rehabilitate.

[-] Neato@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

While I understand the sentiment, it is patently false.

In America prisons are designed to be cruel, not to rehabilitate.

This is unconstitutional and illegal, besides. Therefore the governments and the victims are well within their rights to hold the prisons accountable and liable.

[-] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is unconstitutional and illegal, besides.

Someone call the police!

[-] IthronMorn@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Actually it's totally constitutional. Check your 14th amendment.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Uh, Citation Needed.

Equal protection for protected classes in prison isn't relevant when the issue is prisons not properly protecting their inmates.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Prove it. That's the issue. It's systemic and hard to prove that it's from the top down. Even if you can get some instances, then you need many forms of evidence. Which has a way of disappearing or waiting so long that witnesses die.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt 2 points 1 year ago

The only falsehood about their statement is the implication that all prisons are for-profit.

For example, Louisisna has state and privately owned prisons. Many, if not all, of Louisiana's private for-profit prisons are owned by members of law enforcement. This gives them incentive to fill the cells as much as possible. The rules for these prisons are much more lax than the state-run prisons. While the state prisons have libraries and vocational training, the Private prisons usually don't. At least that's my understanding from a few years back.

Louisiana is also not the only state with private prisons, however most, if not all states, have public prisons as well.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
181 points (98.9% liked)

News

23305 readers
3319 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS