this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
93 points (97.9% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14325 readers
644 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] feelingyourselfdisintergrate@hexbear.net 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't think Women should be forced to sell their bodies to survive. I have nothing against sex-workers, but I am thoroughly opposed to the lecherous sex industry.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think anyone should be forced to sell their bodies to survive. Yay capitalism!

Your original comment doesn’t distinguish that very well.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

i would think in a communist space it would be a given that people hate the industry, not the workers. "sex work is work" is a slogan that's usually used to endorse the industry, e.g. when hasan piker went on twitter to brag about being a sex tourist in germany

Thank you. I had assumed this would be most people's interpretation of my comment, but I should have clarified better.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it’s clear I’m not the only person who read more into the comment than was intended by it. It’s great that she’s clarified.

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

I mean, a ton of the replies are literally 100% the usual SWERF party line, so her dogwhistle obviously worked exactly as she intended.

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"sex work is work" is a slogan that's usually used to endorse the industry

no it isn't, crawl back to your misogynist hellspace over on incelgrad

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Terminology is often fused to a theoretical position so that adopting the term means adopting the political theory behind it. Oftentimes, activists strategically do this. “Sex work is work” is one of those terms. It’s not simply stating that sex work is work, but endorsing a specific theory and calling for an entire political program based off of that theory.

The question often frames the possibility of the answer. The question of whether sex work is work was framed to fuse the interests of the sex worker with the industry. The problem, of course, is that this fusion is entirely superficial because the prostitute’s interests are diametrically opposed to that of the pimp and the buyer. “Sex work is work” then becomes more about protecting the interests of the sex industry and less about protecting women forced and coerced into prostitution.

...

Leftist men who are too lazy to work on improving the material conditions for women can instead opt to support the sex industry. It’s where women who have no other choice belong and we should accept that. So let’s throw all the buzz words around to sound radical: destigmatize, decarcerate, decriminalize, center, solidarity. Yet they can never actually explain where the stigma or violence comes from. And they never explain why their version of “solidarity with sex workers” always aligns with the interests of pimps and buyers. They sound radical while remaining comfortably within the boundaries of male supremacist culture. Their objectification of women remains unchecked.

“Solidarity with sex workers” has been engineered to mean only one thing: normalize, legitimize, expand, and sanitize the sex industry. The other options, by virtue of the slogan’s intended purpose, are intentionally side-lined. Everything else is framed as anti-sex work, which they argue is anti-sex-worker: Guaranteeing the right to not be prostituted, the right to exit, the right to subsist without survival sex, the right for Indigenous women to end prostitution on their land, the right for third world women to not be forced to serve imperialist men. The revolutionary feminist left needs to fight to redefine the meaning of “solidarity with sex workers” as pro-worker, anti-industry.

- Esperanza Fonseca, The problem with the phrase “sex work is work”

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of fucking course you quote a text that is basically the faux-leftist SWERF bible at this point. Thanks for proving my point. Fuck right off and never interact with me again, you misogynist garbahe pile.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if you're so familiar with the text, i guess it can't be said that you so passionately support the sexual exploitation of women out of ignorance

[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if you're going to play like this, you haven't mentioned queer people so far, so I guess you support the sexual exploitation of gay and nonbinary sex worker.

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

I have nothing against sex-workers

I'm not buying that for one second.